Practically all astronomical bodies are in a state of rotation about
an axis. The earth rotates about its axis once every 24 hours, and
Jupiter once every 10 hours, as is shewn by the motion of the red spot
and other markings on its surface. The surface of the sun rotates
every 26 days or so; we can follow its rotation by watching sun-spots,
faculae and other features moving round and round its equator. There
are theoretical grounds for supposing that the sun’s central core
rotates considerably faster than this, most probably performing a
complete rotation in comparatively few days. And it is likely that all
the other stars in the sky are also in rotation, some fast and some
slow. We shall see later how, with advancing age, a star is likely
to shrink in size, and this shrinkage generally causes its speed of
rotation to increase. Now mathematical theory shews that there is a
critical speed of rotation which cannot be exceeded with safety. If the
star rotates too fast for safety, it simply bursts into two, much as
a rotating fly-wheel may burst if it is driven at too high a speed. It
is in this way that one class of binary stars come into being. With a
few exceptions this class is identical with the class of spectroscopic
binaries described in Chapter I (p. 52); the two component stars are
generally too close together to appear as distinct spots of light in
the telescope, only spectroscopic evidence telling us that we are
dealing with two distinct bodies.
Another class of binaries, the visual binaries, which appear quite
definitely as pairs of spots of light in the telescope, probably have
a different origin. We shall see later how the stars first come into
being as condensations of nebulous gas, a whole shoal being born when
a single great nebula breaks up. It must often happen that adjacent
condensations are so near as to be unable to elude each other’s
gravitational grip. In time these shrink down into normal stars, while
the gravitational forces remain just as powerful as before, and we
are left with a pair of stars which must permanently journey through
space in double harness, because they have not energy of motion enough
ever to get clear of one another’s gravitational hold. This mechanism
produces a class of binaries which is precisely similar to that formed
by the break-up of single stars, except for an enormous difference in
scale. The distance between the two components of such a system must be
comparable with the original distance between separate condensations
in the primaeval nebula out of which the stars were born, and so is
enormously greater than the corresponding distance in spectroscopic
binaries, which is comparable only with the diameter of an ordinary
star which has broken into pieces. This explains why visual binaries
appear as distinct pairs of spots of light, while spectroscopic
binaries do not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account