The history of science records one solitary attempt to explain the
sun’s energy as coming in from outside. We have seen how the energy
of motion of a bullet is transformed into heat when the speed of
the bullet is checked. An astronomical example of the same effect
is provided by the familiar phenomenon of shooting-stars. These are
bullet-like bodies which fall into the earth’s atmosphere from outer
space. So long as such a body is travelling through empty space, its
fall towards the earth continually increases its speed, but, as it
enters the earth’s atmosphere, its speed is checked by air-resistance,
and the energy of its motion is gradually transformed into heat. The
shooting-star becomes first hot and then incandescent, emitting the
bright light by which we recognise it. Finally, the heat completely
vaporises it, and it disappears from sight, leaving only a momentary
trail of luminous gas behind. The original energy of motion of the
shooting-star has been transformed into light and heat—the light by
which we see it, and the heat by which it is ultimately vaporised.
In 1849, Robert Mayer suggested that the energy which the sun
emitted as radiation might accrue to it from a continuous fall of
shooting-stars or similar bodies into the solar atmosphere. The
suggestion is untenable, because a simple calculation shews that a mass
of such bodies equal to the weight of the whole earth would hardly
maintain the sun’s radiation for a century, and that the infall needed
to maintain the sun’s radiation for 30 million years would double its
weight. As it is quite impossible to admit that the sun’s weight can be
increasing at any such rate, Mayer’s hypothesis has to be abandoned.
In 1853 Helmholtz put forward a very similar theory, the famous
“contraction-hypothesis,” according to which the sun’s own shrinkage
sets free the energy which ultimately appears as radiation. If the
sun’s radius shrinks by a mile, its outer atmosphere falls through a
height of a mile and sets free as much energy in so doing as would be
yielded up by an equal weight of shooting-stars falling through a mile
and having their motion checked. On Helmholtz’s theory, the different
parts of the sun’s own body performed the _rôles_ which Mayer had
allotted to shooting-stars falling in from outside; they performed
these same parts again and again, until ultimately the sun had shrunk
so far that it could shrink no further. Yet Helmholtz’s theory, like
that of Mayer, failed to survive the test of numerical computation.
In 1862 Lord Kelvin calculated that the shrinkage of the sun to its
present size could hardly have provided energy for more than about 50
million years of radiation in the past, whereas the geological evidence
already noticed (p. 151) shews that the sun must have been shining for
a period enormously longer than this.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account