Obviously, however, we cannot carry out our calculations in this simple
light-hearted way; it would be absurd to suppose that the sun’s last
ton of substance will radiate energy at the same rate as his present
stupendous mass of two thousand million million million million tons.
A series of investigations which culminated in a paper published by
Eddington in 1924, disclosed that, in a general sort of way, a star’s
luminosity depends mainly on its weight. The dependence is not very
precise, and neither is it universal, but when we are told a star’s
weight we can say that its luminosity is likely, with a high degree of
probability, to lie within certain fairly narrow limits. For instance
most stars whose weight is nearly equal to the sun are found to have
about the same luminosity as the sun. In general, as might be expected,
stars of light weight radiate less than heavy stars, but also—and this
could not have been foreseen—the differences in their radiations are
far greater than the differences in their weights. The law which we
have already noticed to hold for a few stars in the neighbourhood of
the sun is true, although in a somewhat different sense, for the stars
as a whole—the candle-power per ton is greatest in the heaviest stars.
For example, the average star of half the weight of the sun does not
radiate anything like half as much energy as the sun: the fraction is
more like an eighth. This consideration extends the future life of
the sun, and indeed of all the stars, almost indefinitely. A sort of
parsimony seems to creep over the stars in their old age; so long as
they have plenty of weight to squander, they squander it lavishly, but
they contract their scale of expenditure when they have little left to
spend. The sand runs slowly through the hour-glass when there is little
left to run.
In the same way, the average star of double the sun’s weight does not
merely radiate twice as much energy as the sun; it radiates about eight
times as much. We must keep this in view in estimating the past life of
the sun; it shortens the sun’s past life just as surely as the opposite
effect lengthens its future life. Observation tells us at what rate
the average star of any given weight spends its weight in the form
of radiation, and, on the supposition that the sun has behaved like
this typical average star at the corresponding stage of its own past
history, we can draw up a table exhibiting its gradual change of weight
as its life progressed. Selected entries from this table would read
somewhat as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account