Statistical methods of investigation shew that there is not a great
number of possible arrangements for a system of stars which has lived
long enough to attain a steady state. If the system as a whole has
no rotation at all, there is only one arrangement; the stars form a
globular mass with perfect symmetry in all directions. The observed
globular clusters (Plate IX, p. 63) provide good approximations to this
type of formation, although Shapley has found that the majority are
not absolutely spherical in shape. If the system as a whole is endowed
with rotation, the possible configurations are all of a flattened
symmetrical shape, like a coin, a watch or a round biscuit—in other
words a system of stars in rotation must be shaped pretty much as we
believe the galaxy to be shaped. Furthermore the motions of these stars
must shew “star-streaming” of precisely the kind discovered by Kapteyn.
Thus both the shape of the galaxy and the peculiarities of motion of
its stars indicate that the galactic system as a whole must be in a
state of rotation. And, as we have seen (p. 67), recent observational
researches by Oort, Plaskett and others make it fairly certain that the
rotation required by theory is an actual fact. The motions of the stars
indicate that the whole galactic system is rotating at a rate which
varies from one region to another, being about one revolution every 230
million years in the vicinity of the sun. And the hub of this gigantic
wheel is found to coincide very closely with the spot which Shapley had
previously fixed as the geometrical centre of the galactic system from
his researches on the distribution of the globular clusters.
Thus, since rotation cannot be generated out of nothing, all the
phenomena agree in shewing that the galactic system must have been
born out of a rotating body. We are acquainted with only one type of
astronomical body which is of sufficient size to turn into a galactic
system, namely the great nebulae, and as the majority of these are
believed, and some are known with certainty, to be in rotation, it
seems reasonable to conclude that the galactic system must have been
born out of a nebula, unless indeed its structure is still such that
we should even now describe it as a nebula if we saw it from the great
distance from which we view the other great nebulae. The observed
period of rotation of the galactic system, of the order of 230 million
years, is substantially longer than the period, either known or
suspected, of any of the nebulae, but the dimensions of the galactic
system are also greater than those of any known nebula, and the two
facts hang together. Again, the number of stars in the galactic system
is probably substantially higher than in any nebula, as also is the
total weight of these stars[21]. All this makes it clear that if the
galaxy is, or ever has been, one of the great nebulae, it must have
been one of unusual size and weight.
[21] The following estimates have already been mentioned:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account