A third objection is of a somewhat different character. Laplace was a
very great mathematician, and there was nothing the matter with his
abstract mathematical theory, so far as it went. More refined modern
analysis has confirmed it at every step, and observation does the
same, as photographs of rotating nebulae (Plate XVI) bear witness.
These photographs exhibit a process taking place before our eyes,
which is essentially identical with that imagined by Laplace, except
for a colossal difference of scale. Everything happens qualitatively
as Laplace imagined, but on a scale incomparably grander than he ever
dreamed of. In these photographs the primitive nebula is not a single
sun in the making, but contains substance sufficient to form hundreds
of millions of suns; the condensations do not form puny planets of the
size of our earth, but are themselves suns; they are not eight or so in
number, but must be counted in millions.
We may ask why the same thing cannot happen on the smaller scale
imagined by Laplace—for are not the conclusions of mathematics
applicable independently of the size of the body with which we are
dealing? The answer has in effect been given already (p. 218).
Everything happens on the smaller scale according to plan until we
come to the formation of the condensations; here the question of scale
proves to be vital. We have seen (p. 196) how the molecules which form
the sun have condensed into a star because of their great number; the
molecules in a room do not condense into anything at all because they
are too few. In the same way, the molecules left behind by the slow
shrinkage of a sun (assuming this for the moment to rotate rapidly
enough to leave molecules behind) would not condense, because at any
instant there would be too few of them available for condensation. They
would be shed by driblets, and a driblet of gas does not condense but
scatters into space. A mathematical calculation decides the question
definitely, and the decision is entirely adverse to the hypothesis of
Laplace. Apart from minor details, the process imagined by Laplace
explains the birth of suns out of nebulae; it cannot explain the birth
of planets out of suns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account