The earth and Neptune, with only one satellite each, and those
comparatively large ones, form the obvious lines of demarcation between
planets which were originally liquid and those which were originally
gaseous. This leads us to conjecture that Mercury, Venus and Pluto must
have become liquid or solid immediately after birth, that the earth and
Neptune were partly liquid and partly gaseous, and that Mars, Jupiter,
Saturn and Uranus were born gaseous and remained gaseous at least until
after the birth of their families of satellites.
We may perhaps find further evidence confirmatory of the tidal theory
in the circumstance that the weights of Mars and Uranus are abnormally
small for their positions in the sequence of planets. If, as we have
supposed, the planets were all born out of a continuous filament of
matter, the weight of Mars at birth would in all probability have been
intermediate between those of the earth and Jupiter, and the weight of
Uranus intermediate between those of Neptune and Saturn. But if, as
we have already been led to suppose, the two anomalous planets Mars
and Uranus were the two smallest planets to be born in the gaseous
state, they would be likely to lose more of their substance than the
other planets through their outermost layers of molecules dissipating
away into space before they had cooled down into the liquid state. If
Mars and Uranus are supposed to be mere relics of planets which were
initially far more massive than they now are, the anomalies begin
to disappear and the pieces of the puzzle to fit together in a very
satisfactory manner.
ORBITAL PLANES. Every rotating mass, whether gaseous, liquid or solid,
has a definite axis of rotation, and, perpendicular to this, a definite
equatorial plane which divides the mass symmetrically into two exactly
equal and similar halves. When a mass breaks up under its own rotation,
the equatorial plane and the symmetry still persist. Illustrations of
this can be found in any set of photographs of rotating nebulae, as,
for instance, those shewn in Plates XV and XVI. In more humble life
an illustration is provided by the splashes of mud thrown off by a
spinning bicycle-wheel, which all keep in the plane in which the wheel
is spinning.
If the sun’s equatorial plane had proved to be a plane of symmetry
for the solar system, so that the whole system was similarly arranged
as regards the two sides of this plane, it might have been possible
to explain the system as the result of a rotational break-up. But the
sun’s equatorial plane is not a plane of symmetry. The planets do not
move in it, most of them moving in a plane which makes an angle of 5
or 6 degrees with it. In terms of our humble analogy, the splashes of
mud are not flying about in the plane in which the bicycle-wheel is
spinning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account