The trouble with the theory is that it seems impossible to regulate the
temperature from the other end. A star whose central temperature is
below 32,000,000 degrees must be contracting without generating heat.
The contraction will not stop dead the moment the critical temperature
is attained; its momentum will carry it on until the central
temperature substantially exceeds 32,000,000 degrees. As soon as the
temperature seriously exceeds 32,000,000 degrees at the centre, that of
a substantial piece of the star will be 32,000,000 degrees or higher.
The annihilation of all this matter must produce a profusion of heat
which would raise the temperature of the star still further, resulting
in more and more annihilation of matter, until finally the whole
star disappeared in a flash of radiation. Indeed Russell’s theory
supposes that matter at 32,000,000 degrees is in a similar condition to
gunpowder at its flash point. Mathematical analysis then shews that a
star whose centre is at a temperature of 32,000,000 degrees would be in
the state of a keg of gunpowder with a spark at its centre, and—well,
“ohne hast, ohne rast” hardly describes the subsequent course of events.
Eddington has suggested that the stability of the stars might be
saved by imagining a time-lag between the instant at which matter
attained the critical temperature necessary for annihilation and the
instant at which this annihilation occurred. It has not yet been
proved that the proposed remedy could be made effective, but even if
it could, other difficulties remain. As the normal star inhabits the
main-sequence, Russell supposed it to be a property of normal matter
to annihilate itself at a temperature of about 32,000,000 degrees, the
supposedly uniform central temperature of all main-sequence stars.
It then became necessary to introduce further special assumptions to
explain the luminosity of white dwarfs and of stars on the red giant
spur line, whose centres are at temperatures very different from
32,000,000 degrees. He accordingly supposed that such stars contained
other types of matter which dissolved into radiation at temperatures
which were respectively higher and lower than 32,000,000 degrees. Even
if the stability difficulty could be overcome, this latter series
of assumptions seems to me to be so artificial as to compel the
abandonment of this interesting theory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account