A very similar method may be used to determine the atomic weights of
the atoms of which the stars are composed. A star is in effect nothing
but a huge X-ray apparatus. We know the weights of many of the stars,
and the rate at which they are generating X-rays is merely the rate at
which they are radiating energy away into space. If we could cut each
atomic nucleus in a star into two halves, we should halve the opacity
of the star, so that radiation would travel twice as far through the
star before being absorbed. If the star were wholly gaseous, this would
result in its expanding to four times its original diameter, and in its
surface-temperature being halved. It follows that we can calculate the
atomic weight of the atoms of which a star is composed from the weight,
luminosity and surface-temperature of the star.
The atomic weights of a number of stars, which I calculated on the
supposition that the stars were wholly gaseous, came out in practically
every case higher than that of uranium, which is the weightiest atom
known on earth. They not only proved to be higher, but enormously
higher; so high indeed, as to seem utterly improbable. Again the
explanation seems to be that the stars are not wholly gaseous. As
soon as stellar interiors are supposed to be partially liquid, the
calculated atomic weights are reduced enormously. They can no longer be
determined exactly, but the atomic number of about 95 to which we were
led from a consideration of the Russell diagram seems to be entirely
consistent with all the known facts.
Indeed other considerations seem to suggest that the atomic numbers
of stellar atoms must be higher than 92. _A priori_ stellar radiation
might either originate in types of matter known to us on earth or
else in other and unknown types. When once it is accepted that high
temperature and density can do nothing to accelerate the generation of
radiation by ordinary matter, it becomes clear that stellar radiation
cannot originate in types of matter known to us on earth. Other types
of matter must exist, and as, with two exceptions, all atomic numbers
up to 92 (uranium) are already occupied by terrestrial elements, it
seems probable that these other types must be elements of higher atomic
weight than uranium.
These super-heavy atoms must not be expected to disclose their presence
in stellar spectra, for these only inform us as to the constitution of
the atmospheres of the stars. And as the lighter atoms float to the
top it is these, in the main, which figure in stellar spectra. If the
sun’s atmosphere had contained any considerable number of super-heavy
atoms when the planets were born, some of them ought still to exist in
the earth. There cannot be any great number, or their high generation
of energy would betray them. The simplest view seems to be that the
heavier atoms sink to the centre in the stars, and that the earth was
formed mainly or solely out of the lighter atoms which had floated to
the sun’s surface.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account