With the unimportant exceptions of potassium and rubidium (of atomic
numbers 19 and 37), the property of radio-activity occurs only in
the most complex and massive of atoms, being indeed confined to
those of atomic numbers above 83. Yet, although the lighter atoms
are not liable to spontaneous disintegration in the same way as the
heavy radio-active atoms, their nuclei are of composite structure,
and can be broken up by artificial means. In 1920, Rutherford, using
radio-active atoms as guns, fired α-particles at light atoms and found
that direct hits broke up their nuclei. There is, however, found to
be a significant difference between the spontaneous disintegration of
the heavy radio-active atoms, and the artificial disintegration of the
light atoms; in the former case, apart from the ever-present β-rays
and γ-rays, only α-particles are ejected, while in the latter case
α-particles were not ejected at all, but particles of only about a
quarter their weight, which proved to be identical with the nuclei of
hydrogen atoms.
These sensational events in the atomic under-world can be photographed
by Professor C. T. R. Wilson’s condensation method already explained.
Plate XIV shews two collisions of an α-particle with a nitrogen
atom photographed by Mr P. M. S. Blackett. The straight lines are
merely the quite uneventful tracks of ordinary α-particles similar to
those already shewn in Plate XIII. But one α-particle track in each
photograph suddenly branches, so that the complete figure is of a
=Y=-shape.
There is little room for doubt that in fig. 1 the branch occurs
because the α-particle has collided with a nitrogen atom; the stem of
the =Y= is the track of the α-particle before the collision; the two
upper branches are the tracks of the α-particle and the nitrogen atom
after the collision, the latter now moving with enormous speed and
hitting everything out of its way. By taking simultaneous photographs
in two directions at right angles, as shewn in the Plate, Mr Blackett
was able to reconstruct the whole collision, and the angles were found
to agree exactly with those which dynamical theory would require on
this interpretation of the photograph.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account