Radiation of this wave-length disturbs only the outermost electrons
in an atom, but radiation of much shorter wave-length may have much
more devastating effects; X-radiation, for instance, may break up the
far more compact inner rings of electrons, the _K_-ring, _L_-ring,
etc., of the atomic structure. Radiation of still shorter wave-length
may even disturb the protons and electrons of the nucleus. For the
nuclei, like the atoms themselves, are structures of positive and
negative electrical charges, and so must behave similarly with respect
to the radiation falling upon them, except for the wide difference
in the wave-length of the radiation. Ellis and others have found
that the γ-radiation emitted during the disintegration of the atoms
of the radio-active element radium-B has wave-lengths of 3·52, 4·20,
4·80, 5·13, and 23 × 10⁻¹⁰ cms. These wave-lengths are only about a
hundred-thousandth part of those of visible light, the reason being
that the atomic nucleus has only about a hundred-thousandth part the
dimensions of the complete atom. Radiation of such wave-lengths ought
to be just as effective in re-arranging the nucleus of radium-B as that
of 100,000 times longer wave-length is effective in re-arranging the
hydrogen atom.
Since the wave-length of the radiation absorbed or emitted by an atom
is inversely proportional to the quantum of energy, the quantum needed
to “work” the atomic nucleus must have something like 100,000 times the
energy of that needed to “work” the atom. If the hydrogen atom is a
penny-in-the-slot machine, nothing less than five-hundred-pound notes
will work the nuclei of the radio-active atoms.
The radio-active nuclei, like those of nitrogen and oxygen, could
probably be broken up by a sufficiently intense bombardment, although
the experimental evidence on this point is not very definite. If so,
each bombarding particle would have to bring to the attack an energy
of motion equal at least to that of one quantum of the radiation in
question, this requiring it to move with an enormously high speed.
Matter at sufficiently high temperatures contains an abundant supply
both of quanta of high energy, and of particles moving with high speeds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account