Uncertain and varying as the careers of most of these publications have
been, they have filled their place in the student scheme of existence;
at least they have given valuable experience to their amateur editors
and publishers and have been a needed vehicle for the expression of
student opinion. The long list of editors includes the names of many
alumni who have made their mark, not only in the world of letters, but
in many other fields. The papers that survived longest usually lived by
virtue of their independence; those that died, did so because they
filled no recognized need or were too crude or too conscientiously
academic. Of the present-day publications, the _Daily_ and the
_Michiganensian_ are apparently fixtures. The _Daily_ sometimes tries
all too apparently to ape the defects and not the merits of the greater
journals and suffers from a constantly changing personnel and lack of
experienced editors, but it is improving and benefiting through a
certain degree of co-operation with the classes in journalism in the
University. The editor and business manager are given a salary and are
subject to close supervision by the Board in Control of Student
Publications, which has so wisely administered the affairs of the
various papers that a fund of some $30,000 has been saved towards the
establishment of a University Press. The same is true of the
_Michiganensian_, which has come to be of impressive bulk, and is
usually on the whole a well edited and printed annual reference book
with numerous illustrations and data concerning all of the student
organizations. A directory of students in the University is also
published under the supervision of the Board in Control as well as a
tri-weekly paper, the _Wolverine_, by the students of the Summer
Session. The alumni publication, the _Michigan Alumnus_, which first
appeared in 1894, will be mentioned in a later chapter.
Interest in public speaking and debating has existed almost from the
first days of the University, though it was only after the establishment
of the Department of Oratory that instruction began to be given
systematically and consecutively. Before that time, some elocutionary
training had been given by Professor Moses Coit Tyler in combination
with his work in English Literature, and later by President Hutchins,
then instructor in Rhetoric and History, who introduced what was then
known as the Junior Debates. These were continued by his successor,
Isaac N. Demmon, who was to become in a few years Professor of English
Literature. The great increase in the work in composition and public
speaking which came with the broadening of the course of study in 1878,
however, led to the abandonment of these debates and instruction in the
subject fell to a low ebb until Professor Trueblood came in 1884 to give
one-third of his time to this work. His success in this field eventually
led to his appointment as Professor of Oratory in 1890.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account