The unseen universe : $b or, physical speculations on a future stateStewart, Balfour
Religion
The unseen universe : $b or, physical speculations on a future state
Stewart, Balfour
Immortality; Religion and science
But very often the morphological peculiarities of a species are
more easily recognised than expressed. No one, for instance, would
fail to rank the horse as one species and the ass as another, even
while ignorant of some of those specific peculiarities which the
naturalist selects as conveying the best scientific account of their
difference.
166. Let us now regard the question of species from its physiological
point of view. Suppose that two individuals, A and B, of different
sexes, breed freely together, producing offspring, and that two
individuals, C and D, do the like.
Now, if the offspring of A and B is capable of breeding freely with
that of C and D, producing offspring, generation after generation,
then A, B, C, and D may be said to belong to the same physiological
species.
To take an illustration borrowed from Professor Huxley: let us
imagine that A is an Arab, and B a dray-horse; also that C is a
dray-horse, and D an Arab. Now the progeny of these two pairs will
all be mongrels, holding a position intermediate between that of the
Arab and the dray-horse; but they will be perfectly fertile amongst
themselves when matched together. We therefore conclude that the
dray-horse and the Arab are not distinct physiological species, but
only varieties of the same species. Again, let A be a horse and B an
ass, also let C be an ass and D a horse. The pairs will still have
offspring, and these will be mules, having a character intermediate
between that of the horse and that of the ass; but, on the other
hand, these mules will not be able to breed together amongst
themselves so as to produce offspring. We are therefore justified
in asserting that a horse and an ass are of different physiological
species.
If we should ever attempt to pair together animals much more unlike
each other than the horse and the ass, we should simply fail. They
will not come together, and we cannot tell whether, if they did, they
would be capable of producing progeny. We may therefore conclude
that, as matter of fact, there are certain well-marked physiological
species that will not breed with each other at all, while there are
other species also physiologically distinct, but not so markedly
separated from each other, that may be brought to breed together,
their offspring being infertile.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account