The unseen universe : $b or, physical speculations on a future stateStewart, Balfour
Religion
The unseen universe : $b or, physical speculations on a future state
Stewart, Balfour
Immortality; Religion and science
119. As the purpose of the poem of Lucretius is the establishment
of the very opposite of our present theme, we must consider a good
deal more of his work than the mere properties of atoms. Lucretius
tells us that his object is to dispel the fear of the gods, which he
supposes to arise simply from the fact that there are so many things
which men do not yet understand, and therefore imagine to be effected
by divine power.
Religion, which crushes human life prostrate upon earth, is, he says,
now put under foot; and the great victory achieved by his Greek
instructor over the immeasurable universe (in finding what can and
what cannot come into being) brings us level with heaven.
His followers are not to fancy that there is any sin in this; on the
contrary, religion has perpetually been the cause of sinful deeds.
There is, however, danger of their relapse, for the terror-speaking
seers may once more overcome them. But if men could only be convinced
that the soul is born and perishes with us, then they would be able
to take their ease, and withstand alike religious scruples and
threatenings of the seers. For this purpose we must find out what
mind and soul consist of, and how everything on earth proceeds; and
if we can do this, we may, of course, dispense with the gods.
120. FIRST, then, _nothing comes from nothing_, which seems to be
meant in the sense that there is a physical cause for everything; at
least all the examples which are adduced in proof of the statement
are mere instances of what might be conceived to happen if there were
no fixed determining physical law or cause. But the author is obscure
on this point, for he sometimes makes us inclined to think that he is
virtually only asserting the eternal, unchangeable, existence of the
atom,—the ‘first beginning of things.’
As a corollary to this, of course, _nature does not annihilate
things_, but dissolves them back into their first bodies. The same
negative proof is here attempted. Nothing is lost, but nature can
beget nothing till she is recruited by the death of something else.
Then, to reconcile the reader to the invisibility of these first
bodies, he is shown how nature works by invisible things, as wind
and moisture; how marriage-rings and paving-stones, ploughshares and
statues, are worn away without the loss of any visible particles.
Nature, therefore, works by unseen bodies. Smell, heat, cold, etc.,
must consist of a bodily nature, because they affect the senses; for
nothing but body can touch and be touched.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account