The unwelcome child : $b Or, The crime of an undesigned and undesired maternityWright, Henry Clarke
Philosophy
The unwelcome child : $b Or, The crime of an undesigned and undesired maternity
Wright, Henry Clarke
Abortion; Sexual ethics
The following extract is from a wife and mother, who, with her husband,
is laboring earnestly and efficiently to elevate the human type. They
are ever active to surround themselves and their children with
knowledge, with just, pure and ennobling views and principles in regard
to marriage and parentage. They think this the _only_ way to save their
sons and daughters from the deep wretchedness and degradation of
inharmonious conjugal relations, from polluted homes, and from the crime
of giving existence to children they do not want. Mark! the woman, whose
modesty is shocked at every effort, however truthful, earnest and
delicate it may be, to enlighten husbands and wives in regard to the
natural laws designed to govern Maternity, and the relation that leads
to it, does not feel at all shocked by _ante-natal_ murder. She can even
justify herself in doing this most foul and monstrous deed:—
“When you lectured in this place, on ‘The Unwelcome Child,’ one lady
went out of the house, affecting to be greatly shocked by what you
said. Yet, that same woman who went out muttering curses on you, for
warning husbands against imposing an undesired maternity on their
wives, has, to my knowledge, had such a loathed and wretched burden
thrust upon her twice, in two years, and each time has killed her
child before it was born. Another lady, my near neighbor, who thinks
such subjects should never be agitated, publicly, has three times,
within so many years, committed the crime of ante-natal murder. The
first child was seven months old when she killed it. She told me this
herself. She is now but twenty-four years old. She has one living
child, and this must suffer for life, from the outrages perpetrated
upon it by the mother, ere its birth. She says she cannot, and will
not, have any more children yet. She says her husband insists on his
gratification, and she cannot prevent conception, and has no
alternative but to kill the children before they are born, or give
existence to those whom her soul repels, and thus entail on them a
mother’s curse. She justifies herself by saying, it is no greater sin
against the child, against herself, against society, and against
humanity, for a mother to kill her child before it is born, than to
give birth to it when her own heart loathes its existence.
“She is one of a large class, who are _thus_ trying to reconcile
themselves to _ante-natal_ murder. Still, she feels degraded, as all
must who do this deed. They _are_ degraded. A deed so unnatural and so
cruel can never be perpetrated without deep injury to the moral nature
of all concerned. The spirit that would kill a child before birth,
would kill it after; the spirit that would commit _ante-natal_ murder,
would commit _post-natal_ murder. But what shall be said of the
husband who subjects his wife to this fearful alternative? Can man do
a deed meaner, more selfish, more satanic?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account