The Vagrancy Problem.: The Case for Measures of Restraint for Tramps, Loafers, and Unemployables: With a Study of Continental Detention Colonies and Labour HousesDawson, William Harbutt
History
The Vagrancy Problem.: The Case for Measures of Restraint for Tramps, Loafers, and Unemployables: With a Study of Continental Detention Colonies and Labour Houses
Dawson, William Harbutt
Poor laws; Poor laws -- Great Britain; Tramps; Unemployed
It may be observed here that the Royal Commissioners who inquired
into the working of the Irish Poor Law in 1833 recommended, in their
Report of 1836, that the able-bodied paupers should be employed in the
reclamation of waste land, in works of drainage and fencing, and in the
building of improved dwellings. They also recommended the establishment
of penitentiaries for vagrants, and the deportation of suitable persons
as free labourers to a non-penal Colony. Substantially this was the
method of treating loafers practised in Holland at that time.
The Vice-Regal Commission enumerated the following classes of people as
suited to detention in Labour Houses:--
(1) Rural vagrants over fifteen years of age.
(2) Urban loafers over fifteen years of age.
(3) Mothers of two or more illegitimate children except when nursing
infants.
(4) All parents who are unfit to be entrusted with the charge of their
children, except mothers nursing infants.
(5) Any able-bodied soldiers or ex-solders who are not self-supporting
or are not supported by the Military Authorities.
(6) Any able-bodied adult persons who may, at the instance of the
police or the local Poor Law Authority, be considered by a Court of
Justice as proper cases, owing to their failure to support themselves.
(7) Destitute able-bodied adults who may voluntarily desire to be
admitted as inmates; and
(8) Any destitute able-bodied adults who may be offered an order of
admission to a Labour House by Poor Law Authorities or their officials
in the prescribed manner, _i.e._, as a test of destitution.[70]
[Footnote 70: _Ibid._, Vol. I., p. 58.]
As to the character of the Labour Houses proposed, the Report of the
Commission states:--
"We should be sorry to see in them anything suggestive of more comfort
than can be derived from very hard work, enough of simple food, clean
healthy buildings, fittings and surroundings, but everything of the
plainest, roughest kind. After the first starting and equipment of
the Labour House we think that the inmates, all of whom would be
able-bodied, ought to be obliged to rely, as far as possible, on
their own labours for their support, and as a stimulus they should be
individually made to feel the necessity for personal exertion."[71]
[Footnote 71: _Ibid._, Vol. I., p. 55.]
The Commission further proposed that these Houses of Detention should
be provided and administered by the General Prisons Board and their
cost be defrayed by the National Treasury.
The English Committee on Vagrancy was the immediate outcome of the more
active interest taken in Poor Law circles in the question of vagrant
regulation during the years 1901 to 1904, and of the great increase in
vagrancy which took place during the trade depression of three of those
years.
It must be remembered that the Vagrancy Committee were called upon to
inquire into the case of wayfarers exclusively; nevertheless, some
of their recommendations are equally applicable to loafers of other
classes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account