The Valuation of Public Service Corporation Property: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,; vol. LXXII, June, 1911, ASCE 1190Riggs, Henry Earle
General
The Valuation of Public Service Corporation Property: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,; vol. LXXII, June, 1911, ASCE 1190
"It has been supposed in the past that rate-making is an exercise of
judgment. It seems to be assumed by many that after a valuation has
been made it will be merely an exercise in mathematics. Suppose the
value of a railway for state purposes is $50,000,000. Then, on this
theory, all that will have to be done will be to multiply this
amount by 6 per cent.—or whatever may be regarded as a fair
return—and so adjust the rates as to enable the road to earn, say,
$3,000,000 a year," but, the writer goes on to ask, "how are the
specific rates to be fixed? A great majority of those who advocate
valuation say that they should be based on the cost of the service.
The proper method, then, would be to ascertain the exact cost of
hauling each commodity and then base rates on these ascertained
costs, making them just high enough to allow the road a fair
return."
Then the article goes on to point out the difficulties of doing this,
which of course we all know, and finally concludes that: "The theory of
basing rates absolutely on the cost of service is unjust and
impracticable." In the present state of the art this is probably true,
but why is it necessary to change the present theory of rate-making
because the rates are to be lowered or raised? If, for instance, it is
shown that it is necessary to reduce the rates sufficiently so that the
net earnings will be reduced, say, approximately 10%, is it beyond the
capacity of the traffic officials of a railroad to adjust their rates
accordingly?
In an editorial in another part of this same issue the _Gazette_
advocates the raising of rates to meet higher prices of supplies and
higher wages; it is surely as feasible to lower rates as it is to raise
them, and, even though it were necessary to base rates on the cost of
service, it does not seem as if that would be entirely impractical,
inasmuch as it is the whole argument advanced for raising the
commutation rates on the railroads entering New York City. Will the
_Gazette_ say that the arguments put forward by these railroads are all
wrong? Mr. Fink, in the article[24] already referred to, states:
"It cannot be said that ... railroads make tariffs; they can only
adjust them to varying conditions."
* * * * *
"Adjusting freight rates is practical work of men who have special
training for it and large experience. They may not all be able to
explain underlying principles, such as the value of service, but
they have used this principle for years, and apply it, intuitively
in every case which comes before them."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account