The Value of MoneyAnderson, Benjamin M. (Benjamin McAlester)
General
The Value of Money
Anderson, Benjamin M. (Benjamin McAlester)
Money
One brief comment may be made on the significance of these figures. It
may be questioned if figures showing the proportions of our industry
devoted to supplying goods for the foreign market correctly indicate the
importance of the foreign market to us. It may be urged that if we
should lose our foreign market, we should merely turn to producing more
for the domestic market, and that the loss would not be the whole of our
receipts from foreign trade, but merely the cost of transition, and the
loss that comes from shifting to production to which we are less suited.
This is, doubtless, true. But the loss reckoned this way may well be
greater than the loss reckoned on the basis of my figures! It is equally
true, moreover, that our domestic trade is not important to the extent
indicated by my figures, since if we lose part of our domestic trade,
our producers will turn to supplying more for the foreign market. But
one must not regard the cost of transition as a negligible matter! The
cost may easily be prolonged depression. Certain parts of our foreign
trade are really vital to us, both on the import and (to a less degree)
on the export side. The most important practical use to which the
figures here given may be put are in connection with short-run problems.
Foreign trade is so important to us that any sudden alteration in its
amount may bring great adversity or great prosperity--as the course of
the present War abundantly testifies.[307]
An application of our method to the years 1850 and 1860 gives a
percentage for foreign trade of 12.7 in 1850, and 16.0 in 1860.[308]
Certain other cautions are needed in presenting these figures. For one
thing, variations in railway rates will make a given volume of gross
earnings mean different things in different years as to the physical
volume of traffic. In the writer's opinion, which is confirmed by
Professor W. Z. Ripley, there is no possible way of making allowance for
this, as the cross-currents affecting railway rates are altogether too
numerous and obscure. Nor has any effort been made to allow for
variations in the proportions of freight and passenger receipts, or of
different classes of freight traffic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account