[28] With respect to the several foregoing and following statements on
feral pigs, _see_ Roulin, in ‘Mém. présentés par divers Savans a
l’Acad.,’ etc., Paris, tom. vi. 1835, p. 326. It should be observed
that his account does not apply to truly feral pigs; but to pigs long
introduced into the country and living in a half-wild state. For the
truly feral pigs of Jamaica, _see_ Gosse’s ‘Sojourn in Jamaica,’ 1851,
p. 386; and Col. Hamilton Smith, in ‘Nat. Library,’ vol. ix. p. 93.
With respect to Africa _see_ Livingstone’s ‘Expedition to the
Zambesi,’ 1865, p. 153. The most precise statement with respect to the
tusks of the West Indian feral boars is by P. Labat (quoted by
Roulin); but this author attributes the state of these pigs to descent
from a domestic stock which he saw in Spain. Admiral Sulivan, R.N.,
had ample opportunities of observing the wild pigs on Eagle Islet in
the Falklands; and he informs me that they resembled wild boars with
bristly ridged backs and large tusks. The pigs which have run wild in
the province of Buenos Ayres (Rengger ‘Säugethiere,’ s. 331) have not
reverted to the wild type. De Blainville (‘Ostéographie,’ p. 132)
refers to two skulls of domestic pigs sent from Patagonia by Al.
d’Orbigny, and he states that they have the occipital elevation of the
wild European boar, but that the head altogether is “plus courte et
plus ramassée.” He refers, also, to the skin of a feral pig from North
America, and says “il ressemble tout à fait à un petit sanglier, mais
il est presque tout noir, et peut-être un peu plus ramassé dans ses
formes.”
[29] Gosse’s ‘Jamaica,’ p. 386, with a quotation from Williamson’s
‘Oriental Field Sports.’ Also Col. Hamilton Smith, in ‘Naturalist
Library,’ vol. ix. p. 94.
[30] S. Sidney’s edition of ‘Youatt on the Pig,’ 1860, pp. 7, 26, 27,
29, 30.
[31] ‘Schweineschädel’ s. 140.
[32] ‘Die Fauna der Pfahlbauten,’ 1861, s. 109, 149, 222. _See also_
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire in ‘Mém. du Mus. d’Hist. Nat.,’ tom. x. p. 172;
and his son Isidore in ‘Hist. Nat. Gen.’ tom. iii. p. 69. Vasey, in
his ‘Delineations of the Ox Tribe,’ 1851, p. 127, says the zebu has
four, and common ox five, sacral vertebræ. Mr. Hodgson found the ribs
either thirteen or fourteen in number; _see_ a note in ‘Indian Field,’
1858, p. 62.
[33] ‘The Indian Field,’ 1858, p. 74, where Mr. Blyth gives his
authorities with respect to the feral humped cattle. Pickering, also,
in his ‘Races of Man,’ 1850, p. 274, notices the peculiar grunt-like
character of the voice of the humped cattle.
[34] Mr. H. E. Marquand, in ‘The Times,’ June 23rd, 1856.
[35] Vasey, ‘Delineations of the Ox-Tribe,’ p. 124. Brace’s ‘Hungary,’
1851, p. 94. The Hungarian cattle descend, according to Rütimeyer
‘Zahmen Europ. Rindes,’ 1866, s. 13 from _Bos primigenius._
[36] Moll and Gayot, ‘La Connaissance Gén. du Bœuf,’ Paris, 1860. Fig.
82 is that of the Podolian breed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account