Finally, let us sum up the more important modifications which domestic
rabbits have undergone, together with their causes as far as we can
obscurely see them. By the supply of abundant and nutritious food,
together with little exercise, and by the continued selection of the
heaviest individuals, the weight of the larger breeds has been more
than doubled. The bones of the limbs taken together have increased in
weight, in due proportion with the increased weight of body, but the
hind legs have increased less than the front legs; but in length they
have not increased in due proportion, and this may have been caused by
the want of proper exercise. With the increased size of the body the
third cervical has assumed characters proper to the fourth cervical
vertebra; and the eighth and ninth dorsal vertebræ have similarly
assumed characters proper to the tenth and posterior vertebræ. The
skull in the larger breeds has increased in length, but not in due
proportion with the increased length of body; the brain has not duly
increased in dimensions, or has even actually decreased, and
consequently the bony case for the brain has remained narrow, and by
correlation has affected the bones of the face and the entire length of
the skull. The skull has thus acquired its characteristic narrowness.
From unknown causes the supra-orbital process of the frontal bones and
the free end of the malar bones have increased in breadth; and in the
larger breeds the occipital foramen is generally much less deeply
notched than in wild rabbits. Certain parts of the scapula and the
terminal sternal bones have become highly variable in shape. The ears
have been increased enormously in length and breadth through continued
selection; their weight, conjoined probably with the disuse of their
muscles, has caused them to lop downwards; and this has affected the
position and form of the bony auditory meatus; and this again, by
correlation, the position in a slight degree of almost every bone in
the upper part of the skull, and even the position of the condyles of
the lower jaw.
REFERENCES
[1] M. P. Gervais, ‘Hist. Nat. des Mammifères,’ 1854, tom. i., p. 288.
[2] U. Aldrovandi ‘De Quadrupedibus digitatis,’ 1637, p. 383. For
Confucius and G. Markham _see_ a writer who has studied the subject in
‘Cottage Gardener,’ Jan. 22, 1861, p. 250.
[3] Owen, ‘British Fossil Mammals,’ p. 212.
[4] Bechstein, ‘Naturgesch. Deutschlands,’ 1801, B. i. p. 1133. I have
received similar accounts with respect to England and Scotland.
[5] ‘Pigeons and Rabbits,’ by E. S. Delamer, 1854, p. 133. Sir J.
Sebright (‘Observations on Instinct,’ 1836, p. 10.) speaks most
strongly on the difficulty. But this difficulty is not invariable, as
I have received two accounts of perfect success in taming and breeding
from the wild rabbit. _See also_ Dr. P. Broca in ‘Journal de la
Physiologie,’ tom. ii. p. 368.
[6] Gervais, ‘Hist. Nat. des Mammifères,’ tom. i. p. 292.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account