suspect that a dwarfed and half-monstrous bird, the parent-form of
the several short-faced sub-breeds, then appeared. I suspect this
because short-faced Tumblers are born with their beaks (ascertained
by careful measurement) as short, proportionally with the size of
their bodies, as in the adult bird; and in this respect they differ
greatly from all other breeds, which slowly acquire during growth
their various characteristic qualities.
Since the year 1765 there has been some change in one of the chief
characters of the short-faced Tumbler, namely, in the length of the
beak. Fanciers measure the “head and beak” from the tip of the beak
to the front corner of the eyeball. About the year 1765 a “head and
beak” was considered good,[42] which, measured in the usual manner,
was 7/8 of an inch in length; now it ought not to exceed 5/8 of an
inch; “it is however possible,” as Mr. Eaton candidly
confesses,“for a bird to be considered as pleasant or neat even at
6/8 of an inch, but exceeding that length it must be looked upon as
unworthy of attention.” Mr. Eaton states that he has never seen in
the course of his life more than two or three birds with the “head
and beak” not exceeding half an inch in length; “still I believe in
the course of a few years that the head and beak will be shortened,
and that half-inch birds will not be considered so great a
curiosity as at the present time.” That Mr. Eaton’s opinion
deserves attention cannot be doubted, considering his success in
winning prizes at our exhibitions. Finally in regard to the Tumbler
it may be concluded from the facts above given that it was
originally introduced into Europe, probably first into England,
from the East; and that it then resembled our common English
Tumbler, or more probably the Persian or Indian Tumbler, with a
beak only just perceptibly shorter than that of the common
dovecot-pigeon. With respect to the short-faced Tumbler, which is
not known to exist in the East, there can hardly be a doubt that
the whole wonderful change in the size of the head, beak, body and
feet, and in general carriage, has been produced during the last
two centuries by continued selection, aided probably by the birth
of a semi- monstrous bird somewhere about the year 1750.
_Runts._—Of their history little can be said. In the time of Pliny the
pigeons of Campania were the largest known; and from this fact alone
some authors assert that they were Runts. In Aldrovandi’s time, in
1600, two sub-breeds existed; but one of them, the short-beaked, is now
extinct in Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account