From this synopsis we see that the several breeds differ
considerably, and they would have been nearly as interesting for us
as pigeons, if there had been equally good evidence that all had
descended from one parent-species. Most fanciers believe that they
are descended from several primitive stocks. The Rev. E. S.
Dixon[7] argues strongly on this side of the question; and one
fancier even denounces the opposite conclusion by asking, “Do we
not perceive pervading this spirit, the spirit of the _Deist_?”
Most naturalists, with the exception of a few, such as Temminck,
believe that all the breeds have proceeded from a single species;
but authority on such a point goes for little. Fanciers look to all
parts of the world as the possible sources of their unknown stocks;
thus ignoring the laws of geographical distribution. They know well
that the several kinds breed truly even in colour. They assert,
but, as we shall see, on very weak grounds, that most of the breeds
are extremely ancient. They are strongly impressed with the great
difference between the chief kinds, and they ask with force, can
differences in climate, food, or treatment have produced birds so
different as the black stately Spanish, the diminutive elegant
Bantam, the heavy Cochin with its many peculiarities, and the
Polish fowl with its great top-knot and protuberant skull? But
fanciers, whilst admitting and even overrating the effects of
crossing the various breeds, do not sufficiently regard the
probability of the occasional birth, during the course of
centuries, of birds with abnormal and hereditary peculiarities;
they overlook the effects of correlation of growth—of the
long-continued use and disuse of parts, and of some direct result
from changed food and climate, though on this latter head I have
found no sufficient evidence; and lastly, they all, as far as I
know, entirely overlook the all-important subject of unconscious or
unmethodical selection, though they are well aware that their birds
differ individually and that by selecting the best birds for a few
generations they can improve their stocks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account