Good Hope. The Thibet mastiff degenerates on the plains of India,
and can live only on the mountains.[71] Lloyd[72] asserts that our
bloodhounds and bulldogs have been tried, and cannot withstand the
cold of the northern European forests.
Seeing in how many characters the races of the dog differ from each
other, and remembering Cuvier’s admission that their skulls differ
more than do those of the species of any natural genus, and bearing
in mind how closely the bones of wolves, jackals, foxes, and other
Canidæ agree, it is remarkable that we meet with the statement,
repeated over and over again, that the races of the dog differ in
no important characters. A highly competent judge, Prof.
Gervais,[73] admits “si l’on prenait sans contrôle les alterations
dont chacun de ces organes est susceptible, on pourrait croire
qu’il y a entre les chiens domestiques des différences plus grandes
que celles qui séparent ailleurs les espèces, quelquefois même les
genres.” Some of the differences above enumerated are in one
respect of comparatively little value, for they are not
characteristic of distinct breeds: no one pretends that such is the
case with the additional molar teeth or with the number of mammae;
the additional digit is generally present with mastiffs, and some
of the more important differences in the skull and lower jaw are
more or less characteristic of various breeds. But we must not
forget that the predominant power of selection has not been applied
in any of these cases; we have variability in important parts, but
the differences have not been fixed by selection. Man cares for the
form and fleetness of his greyhounds, for the size of his mastiffs,
and formerly for the strength of the jaw in his bulldogs, etc.; but
he cares nothing about the number of their molar teeth or mammae or
digits; nor do we know that differences in these organs are
correlated with, or owe their development to, differences in other
parts of the body about which man does care. Those who have
attended to the subject of selection will admit that, nature having
given variability, man, if he so chose, could fix five toes to the
hinder feet of certain breeds of dogs, as certainly as to the feet
of his Dorking fowls: he could probably fix, but with much more
difficulty, an additional pair of molar teeth in either jaw, in the
same way as he has given additional horns to certain breeds of
sheep; if he wished to produce a toothless breed of dogs, having
the so-called Turkish dog with its imperfect teeth to work on, he
could probably do so, for he has succeeded in making hornless
breeds of cattle and sheep.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account