The wild _Sus scrofa_ has a wide range, namely, Europe, North
Africa, as identified by osteological characters by Rütimeyer, and
Hindostan, as similarly identified by Nathusius. But the wild boars
inhabiting these several countries differ so much from each other
in external characters, that they have been ranked by some
naturalists as specifically distinct. Even within Hindostan these
animals, according to Mr. Blyth, form very distinct races in the
different districts; in the N. Western provinces, as I am informed
by the Rev. R. Everest, the boar never exceeds 36 inches in height,
whilst in Bengal one has been measured 44 inches in height. In
Europe, Northern Africa, and Hindostan, domestic pigs have been
known to cross with the wild native species;[3] and in Hindostan an
accurate observer,[4] Sir Walter Elliot, after describing the
differences between wild Indian and wild German boars, remarks that
“the same differences are perceptible in the domesticated
individuals of the two countries.” We may therefore conclude that
the breeds of the _Sus scrofa_ type are descended from, or have
been modified by crossing with, forms which may be ranked as
geographical races, but which, according to some naturalists, ought
to be ranked as distinct species.
Pigs of the _Sus indicus_ type are best known to Englishmen under the
form of the Chinese breed. The skull of _S. indicus,_ as described by
Nathusius, differs from that of _S. scrofa_ in several minor respects,
as in its greater breadth and in some details in the teeth; but chiefly
in the shortness of the lachrymal bones, in the greater width of the
fore part of the palate-bones, and in the divergence of the premolar
teeth. It deserves especial notice that these latter characters are not
gained, even in the least degree, by the domesticated forms of _S.
scrofa._ After reading the remarks and descriptions given by Nathusius,
it seems to me to be merely playing with words to doubt whether _S.
indicus_ ought to be ranked as a species; for the above-specified
differences are more strongly marked than any that can be pointed out
between, for instance, the fox and the wolf, or the ass and the horse.
As already stated, _S. indicus_ is not known in a wild state; but its
domesticated forms, according to Nathusius, come near to _S. vittatus_
of Java and some allied species. A pig found wild in the Aru islands
(‘Schweineschädel’ s. 169) is apparently identical with _S. indicus_;
but it is doubtful whether this is a truly native animal. The
domesticated breeds of China, Cochin-China, and Siam belong to this
type. The Roman or Neapolitan breed, the Andalusian, the Hungarian, and
the “Krause” swine of Nathusius, inhabiting south-eastern Europe and
Turkey, and having fine curly hair, and the small Swiss
“Bündtnerschwein” of Rütimeyer, all agree in their more important
skull-characters with _S. indicus,_ and, as is supposed, have all been
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account