But it will be convenient first briefly to describe all the known
species of Gallus. The _G. Sonneratii_ does not range into the northern
parts of India; according to Colonel Sykes,[372] it presents at
different heights on the Ghauts, two strongly marked varieties, perhaps
deserving to be called species. It was at one time thought to be the
primitive stock of all our domestic breeds, and this shows that it
closely approaches the common fowl in general structure; but its
hackles partially consist of highly peculiar, horny laminæ,
transversely banded with three colours; and I have met with no
authentic account of any such character having been observed {234} in
any domestic breed.[373] This species also differs greatly from the
common fowl, in the comb being finely serrated, and in the loins being
destitute of true hackles. Its voice is utterly different. It crosses
readily in India with domestic hens; and Mr. Blyth [374] raised nearly
100 hybrid chickens; but they were tender and mostly died whilst young.
Those which were reared were absolutely sterile when crossed _inter
se_, or with either parent. At the Zoological Gardens, however, some
hybrids of the same parentage were not quite so sterile: Mr. Dixon, as
he informed me, made, with Mr. Yarrell's aid, particular inquiries on
this subject, and was assured that out of 50 eggs only five or six
chickens were reared. Some, however, of these half-bred birds were
crossed with one of their parents, namely, a Bantam, and produced a few
extremely feeble chickens. Mr. Dixon also procured some of these same
birds and crossed them in several ways, but all were more or less
infertile. Nearly similar experiments have recently been tried on a
great scale in the Zoological Gardens with almost the same result.[375]
Out of 500 eggs, raised from various first crosses and hybrids, between
_G. Sonneratii, bankiva_, and _varius_, only 12 chickens were reared,
and of these only three were the product of hybrids _inter se_. From
these facts, and from the above-mentioned strongly-marked differences
in structure between the domestic fowl and _G. Sonneratii_, we may
reject this latter species as the parent of any domestic breed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account