In the eight first birds, belonging to distinct breeds, in this table,
we see a decided reduction in the weight of the bones of the wing. In
the Indian Frizzled fowl, which cannot fly, the reduction is carried to
the greatest extent, namely, to thirty-three per cent. of their proper
proportional weight. In the next four birds, including the Silk-hen,
which is incapable of flight, we see that the wings, relatively to the
legs, are slightly increased in weight; but it should be observed that,
if in these birds the legs had become from any cause reduced in weight,
this would give the false appearance of the wings having increased in
relative weight. Now a reduction of this nature has certainly occurred
with the Burmese Jumper, in which the legs are abnormally short, and in
the two Hamburghs and Silk fowl, the legs, though not short, are formed
of remarkably thin and light bones. I make these statements, not
judging by mere eyesight, but after having calculated the weights of
the leg-bones relatively to those of _G. bankiva_, according to the
only two standards of comparison which I could use, namely, the
relative lengths of the head and sternum; for I do not know the weight
of the body in _G. bankiva_, which would have been a better standard.
According to these standards, the leg-bones in these four fowls are in
a marked manner far lighter than in any other breed. It may therefore
be concluded that in all cases in which the legs have not been through
some unknown cause much reduced in weight, the wing-bones have become
reduced in weight relatively to the leg-bones, in comparison with those
of _G. bankiva_. And this reduction of weight may, I apprehend, safely
be attributed to disuse.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account