With respect to the two following tables, I may first state that I
tested them by taking another skeleton of a wild duck and of a common
domestic duck, and by comparing the weight of _all_ the bones of the
leg with _all_ those of the wings, and the result was the same. In the
first of these tables we see that the leg-bones in each case have
increased in actual weight. It might have been expected that, with the
increased or decreased weight of the entire skeleton, the leg-bones
would have become proportionally heavier or lighter; but their greater
weight in all the breeds relatively to the other bones can be accounted
for only by these domestic birds having used their legs in walking and
standing much more than the wild, for they never fly, and the more
artificial breeds rarely swim. In the second {286} table we see, with
the exception of one case, a plain reduction in the weight of the bones
of the wing, and this no doubt has resulted from their lessened use.
The one exceptional case, namely, in one of the Call-ducks, is in truth
no exception, for this bird was constantly in the habit of flying
about: and I have seen it day after day rise from my grounds, and fly
for a long time in circles of more than a mile in diameter. In this
Call-duck there is not only no decrease, but an actual increase in the
weight of the wing-bones relatively to those of the wild duck; and this
probably is consequent on the remarkable lightness and thinness of all
the bones of the skeleton.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account