Nathusius gives[263] an analogous and even more striking case: he
imported from England a pregnant sow of the large Yorkshire breed, and
bred the product closely in-and-in for three generations: the result
was unfavourable, as the young were weak in constitution, with impaired
fertility. One of the latest sows, which he esteemed a good animal,
produced, when paired with her own uncle (who was known to be
productive with sows of other breeds), a litter of six, and a second
time a litter of only five weak young pigs. He then paired this sow
with a boar of a small black breed, which he had likewise imported from
England, and which boar, when matched with sows of his own breed,
produced from seven to nine young: now, the sow of the large breed,
which was so unproductive when paired with her own uncle, yielded to
the small black boar, in the first litter twenty-one, and in the second
litter eighteen young pigs; so that in one year she produced
thirty-nine fine young animals!
As in the case of several other animals already mentioned, even when no
injury is perceptible from moderately close interbreeding, yet, to
quote the words of Mr. Coate, a most successful breeder (who five times
won the annual gold medal of the Smithfield Club Show for the best pen
of pigs), "Crosses answer well for profit to the farmer, as you get
more constitution and quicker growth; but for me, who sell a great
number of pigs for breeding purposes, I find it will not do, as it
requires many years to get anything like purity of blood again."[264]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account