The period of life at which the causes that induce variability act, is
another obscure subject, which has been discussed by various
authors.[651] In some of the cases, to be given in the following
chapter, of modifications from the direct action of changed conditions,
which are inherited, there can be no doubt that the causes have acted
on the mature or nearly mature animal. On the other hand,
monstrosities, which cannot be distinctly separated from lesser
variations, are often caused by the embryo being injured whilst in the
mother's womb or in the egg. Thus I. Geoffroy St. Hilaire[652] asserts
that poor women who work hard during their pregnancy, and the mothers
of illegitimate children troubled in their minds and forced to conceal
their state, are far more liable to give birth to monsters than women
in easy circumstances. The eggs of the fowl when placed upright or
otherwise treated unnaturally frequently produce monstrous chickens. It
would, however, appear that complex monstrosities are induced more
frequently during a rather late than during a very early period of
embryonic life; but this may partly result from some one part, which
has been injured during an early period, affecting by its abnormal
growth other parts subsequently developed; and this would be less
likely to occur with parts injured at a later period.[653] When any
part or organ becomes monstrous through abortion, a rudiment is
generally left, and this likewise indicates that its development had
already commenced.
Insects sometimes have their antennae or legs in a monstrous condition,
and yet the larvae from which they are metamorphosed do not possess
either antennae or legs; and in those cases, as Quatrefages[654]
believes, we are enabled to see the precise period at which the normal
progress of development has been troubled. But the nature of the food
given to a caterpillar sometimes affects the colours of the moth,
without the caterpillar itself being affected; therefore it seems
possible that other characters in the mature insect might be indirectly
modified through the larvae. There is no reason to suppose that organs
which have been rendered monstrous have always been acted on during
their development; the cause may have acted on the organisation at a
much earlier stage. It is even probable that either the male or female
sexual elements, or both, before their union, may be affected in such a
manner as to lead to modifications in organs developed at a late period
of life; in nearly the same manner as a child may inherit from his
father a disease which does not appear until old age.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account