The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human NatureJames, William
ReligionComparative
The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature
James, William
Conversion; Experience (Religion); Philosophy and religion; Psychology, Religious; Religion
Yet how believe as the common people believe, steeped as they are in
grossest superstition? It is impossible,—but yet their life! their life!
It is normal. It is happy! It is an answer to the question!
Little by little, Tolstoy came to the settled conviction—he says it took
him two years to arrive there—that his trouble had not been with life in
general, not with the common life of common men, but with the life of the
upper, intellectual, artistic classes, the life which he had personally
always led, the cerebral life, the life of conventionality, artificiality,
and personal ambition. He had been living wrongly and must change. To work
for animal needs, to abjure lies and vanities, to relieve common wants, to
be simple, to believe in God, therein lay happiness again.
“I remember,” he says, “one day in early spring, I was alone in
the forest, lending my ear to its mysterious noises. I listened,
and my thought went back to what for these three years it always
was busy with—the quest of God. But the idea of him, I said, how
did I ever come by the idea?
“And again there arose in me, with this thought, glad aspirations
towards life. Everything in me awoke and received a meaning....
Why do I look farther? a voice within me asked. He is there: he,
without whom one cannot live. To acknowledge God and to live are
one and the same thing. God is what life is. Well, then! live,
seek God, and there will be no life without him....
“After this, things cleared up within me and about me better than
ever, and the light has never wholly died away. I was saved from
suicide. Just how or when the change took place I cannot tell. But
as insensibly and gradually as the force of life had been annulled
within me, and I had reached my moral death‐bed, just as gradually
and imperceptibly did the energy of life come back. And what was
strange was that this energy that came back was nothing new. It
was my ancient juvenile force of faith, the belief that the sole
purpose of my life was to be _better_. I gave up the life of the
conventional world, recognizing it to be no life, but a parody on
life, which its superfluities simply keep us from
comprehending,”—and Tolstoy thereupon embraced the life of the
peasants, and has felt right and happy, or at least relatively so,
ever since.(96)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account