The war and our financial fabricWall, Walter William
History
The war and our financial fabric
Wall, Walter William
Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Currency question -- Great Britain; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain
The banking position and the banking system have stood calm amidst
it all. Even had the banks or the nation possessed that hypothetical
reserve advocated by some, and had it at hand in some safe corner of
London, this would not of itself have made the position more secure.
Other remedial or precautionary measures would still have had to be
taken. Had it not been the particular measures that were actually
conceived and taken, there would have been others. But we happened to
be fortunate in the measures that were adopted, measures that deepened
and strengthened the nation’s confidence.
CHAPTER XXII
FROZEN WEALTH
We are now in a position to look more closely into the wealth of the
banks and at their position in the early days of the crisis, and
to regard them from what I call the standpoint of confidence. Many
happenings were foretold years ago by the prophets as the outcome
of a European war, but they never foretold the closing of the Stock
Exchange, nor foretold a moratorium.
I think it will be safe to say that in the closing days of July no
one in this country dreamed that the Stock Exchange would be closed.
I think it will be safe to say that if this had been foreseen, many
would undoubtedly have predicted disaster as its consequence. Though
the Stock Exchange may be regarded by moralists and puritans as the
shrine of Mammon, a place frequented only by gamblers and parasites,
it came home to them, as it came home to the entire nation, that
the institution plays a vital part in our economic organism. If we
destroyed it, we should have to set up a similar institution in its
place. It is the market for the exchange of certain essential species
of the community’s wealth.
The closing of the Stock Exchange not only froze up a considerable
portion of the wealth possessed by banks, but a far mightier portion
of wealth possessed by the general community. The banks could not
liquefy their wealth, and the community could not liquefy its wealth.
Their wealth was useless to both. There was no market for it, and when
markets no longer work, the machinery of exchange, of production and
distribution, works more slowly, and in some directions comes to a
standstill. This was one market, but, as I have said, it was a vital
market. Its closing restricted the power of the banks to liquefy
capital, it restricted the facilities of merchants, tradesmen, and
others to exchange investments for cash, or liquid capital. In other
words, it had the same effect as the destruction of a vast amount of
capital, and trade and employment suffered accordingly.
Banks, therefore, found themselves in possession of unsaleable
securities, those they held as collateral for loans and those in which
their reserve funds were invested. The Stock Exchange owed to them
approximately £80,000,000. Unable, therefore, to realize this wealth
and to call in their loans, their position was considerably weakened.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account