The war and our financial fabricWall, Walter William
History
The war and our financial fabric
Wall, Walter William
Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Currency question -- Great Britain; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain
Many critics have foretold disaster from the inadequacy of the gold
reserves against the liabilities in the Post Office Savings Bank. The
Post Office Savings Bank and the joint stock banks perform distinct
functions. The Savings Bank does not lend. It does not transform wealth
into liquid currency. It is a huge State safe, where public savings are
kept in safety, and it performs the functions of the old silver teapot
in the household. Being a purely State or National institution, it is a
national liability. It has behind it the entire wealth of the nation,
and it is absolutely safe unless the nation be swallowed up in the
seas. And if it were swallowed up the depositors would not need their
money.
Gold, after all, performs but limited functions. It is becoming less
necessary in the internal economy of the State owing to the growth
of cheques. Gold is merely a symbol, and we should not bow before it
in abject obeisance. It is even becoming of less importance in its
international functions, and I think the European war will lessen its
importance still further. European nations have collected it more
for war purposes than for commercial. This has been the case with
Germany, which, in the consciousness of its determination to fight
for world dominion, amassed the gold as a war chest. This gold is not
in circulation, but is lying idle in the Reichsbank, in order that
the Government may flood the country with various sorts of paper
currency. This paper currency will in time be so inflated as to become
greatly depreciated. This is the danger run, the danger of inflation
and depreciation, yet we never dream of the inflation of our cheque
currency, because it grows and contracts with our output of wealth.
The depreciation of paper currency is evidence often that a nation is
living beyond its income. We know the fate awaiting the individual
when he “outruns the constable.” In order to avoid insolvency he must
live more frugally, live well within his income, and liquidate his
debts. Then, in time, he will be free and will not live in dread of his
creditors.
If a nation lived within itself, built a huge rampart around itself,
and had no commercial intercourse with other nations, if it could live
a happy, contented community, on its own resources, then an inflated
currency would have no ill effects. It would not necessarily bring
bankruptcy and ruin. It would be like a private individual living on
his own resources and on the fruits of his own labour, interchanging
nothing with his neighbours. Such a hermit would be indebted to no man.
He would depend on nature alone, and if nature failed him, or sickness
overtook him, then he would die.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account