The war and our financial fabricWall, Walter William
History
The war and our financial fabric
Wall, Walter William
Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Currency question -- Great Britain; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain
These deposits, then, are not strictly a loanable fund, otherwise the
more they grew the greater would be the fund. In fact, the fund would
be inexhaustible, increased and not diminished by the demands made
upon it. We know they are increased by loans. Therefore the best means
of increasing the fund would be by increasing the loans, and we could
then witness money actually piling up mountain-high in our midst. This
could put all fables of money-making by magic into the shade.
Instead, however, of increasing the fund by lending as fast as physical
resources will permit, the banks adopt the contrary policy. They stop
making loans and simultaneously diminish the loans they have already
made.
Whatever views the public may hold, bankers labour under no delusions
as to the real nature of the loan-fund. They know well enough they do
not lend out of that fund at all, for if they lent out of it they would
inordinately increase it by lending and so make more profit. It helps
to shed more light on the nature of the deposits. Why are banks anxious
to diminish the deposits in times of anxiety and apprehension? That
is to say, the loan deposits, and not the pure deposits? Why are they
anxious to diminish the aggregate of the so-called money fund?
They wish to take away from their borrowers their power to withdraw,
even temporarily, gold. If they take this power from them the banks
know they will be in a far stronger position, even should the deposits
diminish by fifty per cent. In their own language bankers say: “We
must strengthen our cash position.” This means, then, that the cash
fund and the deposit fund are not one and the same thing. The cash
fund is strengthened by weakening the deposit fund. Cash grows as the
loanable fund falls.
If the loan deposits are thereby greatly diminished until the deposits
are mainly what I have called pure deposits, it shows how the banks
safeguard themselves when they think danger is coming. Their assets
change. Gold takes the place of other wealth, and the banks are able
the better to meet a run on the part of their depositors. They have
automatically met the danger from the presence of the loan-deposits,
and now they have only to face the danger from the pure deposits. They
have fortified themselves for this by differentiating between the
characters of their deposits, which in their aggregate are misleadingly
called the loan fund of Lombard Street. The gold is the real lending
fund.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account