Apache Indians -- Fiction; Historical fiction; Western stories
“The language of the white-eyes can be turned into a weapon against them
if we understand it,” said the youth. “Now they use it against us. That
I saw at Hot Springs when Geronimo and the other warriors were made
prisoners. It was all done with the talk of the white-eyes; no other
weapon did they use. Had I known how to use that weapon—had Geronimo,
or any other of us known—we might have defeated them, for we had the
right upon our side.”
“Shoz-Dijiji makes good talk,” said an old man. “At the post they have a
school where they wish us to send our children and to come ourselves to
learn their language. There are but three children in this school and
they are all orphans. If they had had parents they would not have been
permitted to go. The pindah lickoyee will be glad to have you come.”
And so it was that Black Bear attended the school of the pindah lickoyee
and learned their strange language. He stayed and worked in the school
after the class was dismissed that he might ask questions of the teacher
and learn more rapidly. His teacher, the wife of an officer, pointed to
him with pride and told her friends that the example set by Black Bear
would probably do more toward pacifying and civilizing the Apaches than
all the soldiers in the United States Army could accomplish.
“If they understand us they will learn to respect and love us,” she
said; “and they cannot understand us until they understand our
language.”
And to his people Shoz-Dijiji said: “The pindah lickoyee are fools and
their tongue is the tongue of fools; but it is well to know it. Already
I have learned things about them that otherwise I could never have
known, and when I take the war trail against them as a man there will be
no arrow in my quiver with which I can inflict more harm upon them than
with this—my knowledge of their language.”
For three months Shoz-Dijiji attended school regularly, studied
diligently, learned quickly. His teacher was transported into raptures
whenever she had occasion to mention him in the presence of her friends,
and that was often, as the topics of conversation at a frontier army
post are meager at the best. Her husband was skeptical, as were all of
the older officers.
“He’s an Indian,” they said, “and the only good Indian is a dead
Indian.”
Thus understandingly, sympathetically, has the Indian question been
approached by many army men, and by practically all of the civilians of
the frontiers. To have said: “He is an Indian. He stands in the way of
our acquisition of his valuable possessions. Therefore, having no power
to enforce his rights and being in our way, we will destroy him,” would
have been no more ruthless than the policy we adopted and cloaked with
hypocrisy. It would have had the redeeming quality of honesty, and would
have been a policy that the Apaches could have understood and admired.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account