The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
The court had not been long upon its tour through the provinces before
Catherine de Medici discovered that the petition of the estates of
Burgundy for the abolition of Protestant worship was not merely a local
prejudice, but the sense of the provinces.[829] The elements of this
public opinion were various: The clergy—not all, however—wanted the
findings of the Council of Trent accepted _in toto_; all of them were
dissatisfied with the recognition of the rights of the Protestants;
the alienation of their lands was a grievance to the clergy, the more
so because speculators had bought them at a low price because of the
doubt as to the validity of the title.[830] The Guises were angry
that the prosecution of Coligny for the murder of the duke had been
abandoned.[831] Among high and low alike there were unprincipled folk
who had hopes of profiting by confiscations and forfeitures imposed
upon the Huguenots.[832]
The queen mother was too good a politician not to pay heed to these
signs of popular feeling, more especially as the voice of the provinces
chimed with those in high authority, who not only urged that the war
be renewed against the Protestants but also hinted broadly of foreign
support in aid of the crown. At first Catherine answered graciously,
yet guardedly, to the effect that a peace which had been so solemnly
made, by the advice of the princes of the blood and the council, could
not be too lightly cast aside.
The miserable effects of the war were everywhere evident. Agriculture
had almost ceased in a country famous for its fertility, and the whole
country had been so plundered and harassed by both parties that the
poor people, being stripped of all their substance, often preferred
to fly to the forests rather than to remain continually exposed to
the mercy of their enemies. Wandering soldiers and dissolute women,
with stolen goods in their possession, infested the roads.[833] As to
trade and manufacturing, the mechanic arts still were plied only in
the largest and strongest towns; even here merchants and tradesmen had
shut up shop and gone off to war, not always out of religious zeal,
but in the hope of enriching themselves by spoliation. The nobility
were divided; the clergy incensed. The civil war had been accompanied
by the attendant aids of violence, robbery, murder, rape, and justice
had not been administered in the courts for months. The very methods
resorted to for the preservation of religion rendered it hateful in the
eyes of many men of both parties. Both parties were bigoted in belief
and in practice. The iconoclasm of the Protestants, who tore down
church edifices hoary with age and sanctified by tradition, expelling
the inmates, both male and female, if doing them no worse injury,
familiarized society with changes wrought by violence and made the
people callous to one of the most precious possessions of a nation—a
reverence for tradition.[834]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account