The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
It is interesting to observe the efforts made by local authorities to
prevent the spread of the disease and the relief measures that were
taken. As soon as the plague was discovered, the town authorities
usually set guards to watch the houses of those stricken and appointed
barbers and gravediggers to treat ill and to inter the dead. These
attendants were supported and paid by a tax laid upon the town. Those
who were ill were sent to a house of isolation appointed to be a
hospital, which was often upon the walls of the town, remote from the
people. In Provins the church and cemetery were immediately adjacent
to the hospital! The mortality was great. In Provins in 1562 there
were eighty persons stricken, of whom sixty died, among them four of
the attendants. Two of the barber-surgeons refused to serve and were
proceeded against by the town bailiff and were hanged in effigy because
the principals in the case had made their escape. Diseased houses were
sprinkled with perfumes and aromatic herbs were burned in them in order
to purify them.[841] As always, the dislocation of society and the
depravation of morals worked havoc in the community. Crimes of violence
were common.[842]
Little by little, however, this picture of misery faded into the
background of the queen’s mind and the question of political
expediency, which was always the lodestar of her policy, became her
primary consideration.[843] The Catholics plucked up courage as the
court progressed[844] and Huguenot suspicion of the queen’s course was
early aroused. Shortly after the tour of the provinces had begun, and
while the court was still at Troyes pending the signature of the treaty
of peace, there was a jar between D’Andelot and the queen mother, who
would not permit him to choose his own captains and other officers as
was customarily permitted to colonels. Partially in consequence of
this affront, and partially to avoid being compromised more with Queen
Elizabeth, D’Andelot, the prince of Condé, and the cardinal Châtillon
all remained away from the sessions of the council while the terms
of peace were under consideration, and when the court resumed its
migration, no one of these attended it.[845] Indeed, after the court
left Châlons-sur-Marne, so wide was the breach between the prince of
Condé, the admiral and all of that faction, and the court, that the
chancellor L’Hôpital was the only official who continued to treat them
with deference.[846] The consideration shown Jeanne d’Albret only
partially relieved the suspicions of the Protestants.[847]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account