The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
a fort of earth only five paces from the turnpike which marked the
French limit; secondly, because at this embarrassing time Elizabeth
of England had conceived the thought of reviving the English claim to
Calais.[1087] With the purpose of fathoming her son-in-law’s designs
Catherine sent the younger L’Aubespine to Madrid.[1088] War with Spain
was already on the lips of some in France.[1089]
In spite of the wisdom of these military precautions on the part of
the French crown, the Huguenots grew alarmed lest there was a movement
on foot to repress the edict.[1090] There was designed intention in
the unadmirable conduct of the prince of Condé, and perhaps some in
that of Coligny too. The prince craved chief command of the army, and
a war with Spain was in a direct line with his aspirations. He had
been well treated since the peace of Amboise, having been given the
government of Picardy and the county of Rotrou, which was erected
into a duchy under the name of Enghien-le-François. But his appetite
for power was insatiable. In July, after angry speech with the King,
Condé had retired from court, and was followed by the admiral, who gave
out that he had discovered “some practice that wholly tended to his
confusion.”[1091]
It was small politics. In this time of external danger from the
furtive designs of Philip II and the blustering enmity of England,
the honorable course of every subject of France was to stand by the
King and the nation. The Huguenot leaders compromised the cause at
large by indulging their personal vanity, their petty spite, their
pique at such an hour. Friction there was, disagreement there was over
the interpretation and the working of certain parts of the edict of
Amboise. The Catholics, for example, complained that the intention of
the edict was evaded by the Huguenots, asserting that in cases where
the right of preaching was permitted to all barons and high justiciars
only for themselves and their tenants, and for others of lower degree
for their household only, congregational worship was held under cover
thereof.[1092]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account