The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
But the admiral and Montgomery followed up this clever deed by a
blunder so bad that the Reformed suffered for it for years afterward,
and were saved from losing Béarn, perhaps, as they had almost lost it
before, by the intervention of the Peace of St. Germain. Coligny’s
original plan was to pass the rest of the winter and until harvest
in Gascony and Guyenne, with Port Ste. Marie as his base and to have
heavy artillery brought from the fortresses of Béarn with which to take
all the towns upon the Garonne as far as Bordeaux. The bridge assured
them control of two of the richest provinces of France, for they were
absolute masters of the field. By this means Bordeaux would have been
at their mercy, for the sea power of the Huguenots at Blaye[1425] was
sufficient to close the city upon the sea side. It could not have held
out for more than three months, for already corn was selling there at
ten livres per sack. Bordeaux itself was rich and strong but situated
in a barren country, so that, deprived of the Garonne and Dordogne, it
could presently be reduced to famine. As for the Protestant army it
would have fared well. The lesser towns like Libourne and Lectoure must
inevitably have succumbed with their stores, and the viscounts were in
full possession of Comenge and Loumaigne, the most fertile counties
of all Guyenne. There were numerous stores of grain here, for it was
a practice of the dealers and even gentlemen, to accumulate three or
four years’ store in anticipation of a dear year. Had the Huguenots
once got Bordeaux in their clutches, they might have boasted that they
had the best and strongest angle of the kingdom, both by land and
sea, commanding five navigable rivers. The bridges over the Charente
at Saintes and Cognac, being in their hands, no one could pass from
Saintonge to Bordeaux where La Noue lay, “as valiant a man as any that
ever was in France.” The river system of the southwest—the Charente,
Ile, Dordogne, Lot, and Garonne—could have been made to bind the whole
region into a compact whole if this plan had been carried out, and from
behind these natural barriers the Protestants might have defied all the
King’s armies.
Yet although Coligny’s army tasted of Bordeaux wine and his reiters
watered their horses in the Garonne, he did not go on. He failed to
see that the most vital need of the Huguenots was to gain complete
mastery of the sea. This is what La Noue perceived and Coligny did
not. After the loss of Rouen they had but one important port town at
their command, La Rochelle, which the blunders of the government in
the second civil war had permitted the Protestants to make their own,
on which depended Brouage, reputed the fairest and most commodious
haven in all the kingdom, and the chief staple for salt in all the
southwest.[1426]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account