The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Simony is openly permitted. Benefices are held by married gentlewomen
who employ the revenues far differently to the intention of the
founders. The people are left without religious instruction and
thus stray from the true religion. There is but little justice to
be obtained through the venality of the tribunals, causing their
neighbors to hold them in abomination. The number of those holding
office is very great and part of them notoriously incapable and the
rest poor, being thereby prone to evil actions. Justice is further
impeded by the impunity with which murder is committed. Great
cruelties and barbarities are committed by the foot soldiers and
by the gendarmerie, which does not now consist of gentlemen but of
persons of vile condition. Not only by these, but by the soldiers of
his guard, is pillage made on the houses of his people, ecclesiastical
holdings, and hospitals even in Paris itself, so that the poor cannot
obtain common necessaries.[1727]
During these weeks Montmorency had earnestly labored in favor of peace,
pleading, arguing, expostulating both with his own younger brothers
and Alençon. He was as earnestly supported by Catherine de Medici, now
converted to a peace policy by the force of events,[1728] but both
were continually thwarted either by the King’s inconstancy or the
machinations of the Guises.
The illness of the queen mother—she suffered so much from sciatica
that often she was unable to leave her chamber—and the frivolity of
the King were a positive advantage to the Guises’ policy.
It will be remembered that the fortress of La Fère had been tentatively
demanded of the King for the prince of Condé. Henry III had replied
offering Doulens in Picardy instead of either La Fère or Peronne, which
was later suggested, on the plea that he could not exact obedience from
the inhabitants of the latter places. This demand for a border fortress
near Flanders was made by the duke of Alençon, in reality to further
his own advantage in the Spanish Netherlands, and he took the method
of having Condé take title to it as a means of concealing his purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account