The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Still the queen mother persevered, taking her counsel from the
chancellor L’Hôpital, the admiral Coligny, the prince of Condé, and
his brother, D’Andelot, and adhered to her resolution to permit
the Huguenots to enjoy freedom of worship. On January 3, 1562, the
chancellor made an earnest plea for religious toleration before the
Court of Parlement,[469] which was followed by the most decisive
action the government had yet taken, namely the issuance of the famous
edict of toleration of January 17, known as the Edict of January,
which was the first that granted exercise of the Reformed religion _in
public_.[470]
This edict was expressly declared to be _provisional_ in its nature,
pending the decisions of the Council of Trent, which, by a coincidence,
was opened on the day following, January 18, 1562, the first formal
session being set for the second Thursday in Lent.[471] The preamble
recited that the government’s action was taken in consideration of
the state of affairs prevailing in the kingdom; that it was not to be
construed as approving the new religion; and that it was to remain
in force no longer than the King should order; it deprecated the
“disobedience, obstinacy, and evil intentions of the people” which made
even provisional recognition of Calvinism necessary. Specifically, the
edict provided for the restoration by the Huguenots of all property
unlawfully possessed by them; it forbade them to _erect_ any churches,
either within or without the cities and towns (Art. 1) or to assemble
for worship within the walls thereof either by day or night, or under
arms (Arts. 2, 5). Protestant worship was required to be in the
daytime, outside the town gates, in the open, or, if under cover, in
buildings occasionally used, and not formally consecrated as churches.
For this reason the Reformed ministers preached, some in the fields,
others in gardens, old houses, and barns, according to their particular
inclinations or convenience. For they were expressly forbidden to build
any chapels, or meddle with the churches, upon any account. Access
to their meetings was always to be permitted to the King’s officers,
i.e., bailiffs, seneschals, provosts, or their lieutenants, but _not_
to officers of judicature (Arts. 3, 6; and supplementary declaration
of interpretation, February 14, 1562). Furthermore, the raising of
money among the Huguenots was to be wholly voluntary and not in the
form of assessment or imposition. They were to keep the political
laws of the Roman church, as to holidays and marriage, in order to
avoid litigation and confusion of property rights; and to refrain from
harboring any person who might be accused, prosecuted, or condemned
by the government, under penalty of a fine of 1,000 crowns, to be
devoted to charity, together with whipping and banishment (Arts. 8,
9, 12). The use of reproachful or vituperative language touching the
faith or practice of the Catholic church was made a misdemeanor (Art.
10).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account