The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
and D’Andelot soon joined him.[497]
Meanwhile Catherine de Medici, fearful lest the person of the King
would be forcibly seized by the Guises, and recognizing that the king
of Navarre had surrendered completely to the Triumvirate, endeavored to
remove the King to Blois. But Antoine hotly protested against so overt
a move in favor of the Huguenots and Spain’s ambassador fulminated
so strongly against “the evil reputation” of L’Hôpital,[498] that
the court was compelled to go to Fontainebleau instead.[499] Even
this place met with small favor on the part of the Guises, who would
have preferred keeping the court in Paris. But when they urged the
necessity of the queen’s presence in the council in consideration of
the grave state of affairs, Catherine caustically rejoined that she
thought “it more meet to have regard to the health of the King than to
inform so many wise men what was necessary to be done.” This speech
of the queen mother, however, was not said altogether in sarcasm. For
instead of following the advice of the constable, who showed signs of
resenting the Guise ascendency, that the crown repudiate and condemn
the massacre of Vassy and announce its determination to maintain the
Edict of January,[500] Catherine in her alarm lest the rising of the
Huguenots sweep the Valois dynasty from the throne began to incline
toward Spain.[501] For the time being the Triumvirate professed itself
satisfied, intending after Easter to compel the court to repair to
Bois de Vincennes, in order to have the King in their midst and thus
strengthen with his name the authority of their actions.[502] Great
was the alarm, therefore, when the prince of Condé, accompanied by
the admiral Coligny and D’Andelot, appeared before the gates of Paris
on March 29 with three thousand horse.[503] Immediately all the
bridges were drawn up and preparations made to meet an attack.[504]
Already extraordinary arrangements had been made for the defense of
Paris. Strangers were compelled to leave the city; no persons except
gentlemen were permitted to wear arms and these were limited to sword
and dagger; only six gates were open and these were under double
guard.[505] Failing to enter the city, the prince quartered his troops
at St. Cloud and took possession of the highroad from Paris to Orleans
at Longjumeau, while in Paris the duke of Guise, the king of Navarre,
and the constable hastened forward the preparations for war.[506]
But the prince of Condé refrained from the use of force. He gave out
that he had as much right to enter the city under arms as had Guise,
and complained of the fact that Guise and his following, on March 27,
which was Good Friday, had visited the King and Queen at Fontainebleau,
where the latter “made them strange countenance because the train
came in arms to the court.”[507] The apparent purpose of the prince
of Condé was to cut Fontainebleau off from Paris, for the admiral lay
at Montreuil, but four leagues distant, and thus force a reasonable
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account