The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Violence increased both in the cities and in the provinces. In the
southeast Somarive committed great cruelties in Orange, killing men,
women, and children wherever he went.[573] But the achievements of
Montluc, “the true creator of the French infantry”[574] were the
conspicuous feature of the war in the south. By his own confession
this famous soldier “rather inclined to violence than to peace, and
was more prone to fighting and cutting of throats than to making of
speeches.”[575] The war in the southern provinces, it is plain, was
one of both politics and religion. The practices of the Huguenots
penetrated the whole administrative machinery. The sieur de Burie,
king’s lieutenant in Guyenne, was old and overcautious, and not without
suspicion of Calvinism,[576] while Duras, the Huguenot leader was so
active that the crown had sent the veteran of the siege of Sienna into
Guyenne in January, 1560, with a special commission.[577] The Huguenots
tried to buy Montluc off through one of their captains formerly with
him before Sienna, who came to him saying that the church at Nérac had
made him their captain. Montluc’s reply nearly took the captain off his
feet. “What the devil churches are those that make captains?” was his
fierce question.[578] He speedily began to make his name formidable by
hanging six Huguenots without process of law “which shook great fear
into the whole party.”
Montluc’s arrival was in the nick of time for the Catholics of the
south. He thought that if the Huguenots had been more led by soldiers
and not so “guided by ministers, they had not failed of carrying
Bordeaux and Toulouse. But God preserved those two forts, the
bulwarks of Guyenne, to save all the rest.” Montluc was everywhere at
once, never resting long in any place, holding his foes in suspense
everywhere, and not only was himself in continual motion, but also
with letters and messages perpetually solicited and employed all the
friends he had.[579] His troops were few in numbers and so ill-paid
that he sometimes was reluctantly compelled to ransom his prisoners.
“We were so few that we were not enough to kill them all,” he
comments. “Had the King paid his companies I should not have suffered
ransom to have been in use in this quarrel. It is not in this case as
in a foreign war where men fight for love and honor. In a civil war we
must either be master or man, being we live as it were, all under a
roof.” He was as good as his word and “shook a great terror into the
country everywhere.” When he appeared before Agen he “wondered that the
people should be so damnably timorous and did not better defend their
religion.” Instead “they no sooner heard my name but they fancied the
rope already about their necks.” Yet terrible as the old war-dog was,
he still waged war according to the rules of the game. He is outspoken
in condemnation of the conduct of the Spanish companies sent by Philip
II which joined him before Agen.[580] The importance of Montluc’s
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account