The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and LancasterEdgar, John G. (John George)
History
The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and Lancaster
Edgar, John G. (John George)
Great Britain -- History -- Wars of the Roses, 1455-1485
At Windsor the king received intelligence of the step Clarence had
taken; and the affair being reported to him in the worst light, he
appears to have been seized with something like temporary insanity, and
to have regarded Clarence's destruction as essential to his own safety
and that of his children. No sooner, in any case, was news conveyed
to him that Clarence was "flying in the face of all justice," than he
hastened to Westminster, summoned the duke to the palace, and ordered
him to be committed to the Tower.
Having pushed matters to this crisis, the Woodvilles did not allow
Edward's passion to cool. It was in vain that the lord chancellor
attempted to reconcile the king and the captive. A Parliament was
summoned to meet about the middle of January; and when, on the
appointed day, the English senators assembled at Westminster, the
judges were summoned to the House of Lords, and Clarence was brought
to the bar to be tried by his peers--the young Duke of Buckingham, who
had married the queen's sister, presiding as lord high steward, and
Edward appearing personally as accuser. Absurd as some of the charges
were, Clarence had no chance of escape. He was charged with having
dealt with the devil through necromancers; represented Edward as
illegitimate and without right to the throne; plotted to dethrone the
king and disinherit the king's children; retained possession of an act
of Parliament, whereby, in the reign of Henry, he had been declared
heir to the crown after Edward of Lancaster; purchased the support of
the Lancastrians by promising to restore their confiscated estates;
and warned his own retainers to be ready to take up arms at an hour's
notice. Clarence indignantly denied every charge; but his protestations
of innocence were as vain as those of Burdet had been. Edward appeared
bent on a conviction, and the peers had not the courage to resist such
a pleader. The royal brothers, indeed, would seem to have had all the
talk to themselves--"no one denying Clarence but the king, and no one
answering the king but Clarence." Even the self-sufficient Buckingham
contented himself with asking the judges "whether the matters proved
against Clarence amounted in law to high treason." The opinion of the
judges was altogether unfavorable to the duke. The legal functionaries
answered the lord high steward's question in the affirmative, and the
peers returned a unanimous verdict of "Guilty." On the 7th of February
Buckingham pronounced sentence of death.
When matters reached this alarming stage, the Duchess of York
interfered; and the king, in a somewhat relenting mood, delayed sending
his brother to the block. The Woodvilles, however, were not to be
baffled of their prey; and the House of Commons, acting under their
influence, petitioned for the duke's immediate execution. But the
son-in-law of Warwick, with all his failings, was still the idol of the
populace; and the policy of having him beheaded on Tower Hill was more
than doubtful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account