The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and LancasterEdgar, John G. (John George)
History
The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and Lancaster
Edgar, John G. (John George)
Great Britain -- History -- Wars of the Roses, 1455-1485
Markham was of a family of lawyers, whose progenitors, though scarcely
wealthier than yeomen, had held their land from time immemorial, and
been entitled to carry coat armor. Having been early called to the bar,
and successful in his profession, he became a puisne judge of the court
of king's bench; and having strongly supported the claims of the house
of York, and greatly contributed, by his abilities and learning, to
the triumph of the White Rose, he succeeded Fortescue as chief justice.
But, though zealous for the hereditary right of the house of York,
Markham was neither a minion nor a tool of its members; and, though
he could not but be aware what the court expected, he was incapable
of doing any thing to forfeit the public respect which he enjoyed as
"The Upright Judge." When, therefore, the evidence against Cooke had
been taken, and the whole case heard, the chief justice ruled that the
offense was not treason, but, at the most, "Misprision of Treason," and
directed the jury so to find it.
The lands of Sir Thomas Cooke were saved, and the Woodvilles, angry
as wild beasts deprived of their prey, vowed vengeance on the chief
justice. Accordingly Earl Rivers and his duchess pressed Edward to
dismiss the unaccommodating functionary; and Edward swore that Markham
should never sit on the bench again. Markham, submitting with a dignity
becoming his high character, carried his integrity into retirement; and
Sir Thomas Cooke was set free after he had paid an enormous fine.
Every man of intelligence must now have seen that the Woodvilles
would embroil Edward with the nation. While the king was, under their
influence, perpetrating such enormities as caused grave discontent,
he was aroused to a sense of insecurity by formidable commotions in
the north. For the origin of these, the master and brethren of the
Hospital of St. Leonards appear to have been responsible. The right of
levying a thrave of corn from every plow in the country for the relief
of the poor had, it seems, been granted to the hospital by one of the
Anglo-Saxon kings; but the rural population complained that the revenue
was not expended for charitable purposes, but employed by the master
and brethren for their private advantage. After long complaining, the
people of the country refused to pay, and, in retaliation, their goods
were distrained and their persons imprisoned. At length, in 1469,
finding they could get no redress, the recusants took up arms, and,
under a captain named Robert Hulderne, they put the officers of the
hospital to the sword, and, to the number of fifteen thousand, marched,
in hostile array, to the gates of York.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account