The reek of liquor was still in the air, the sawdust itself was
redolent of it. But none of this now stirred the blood of David Joslin.
Two or three times he raised the half-full glass in front of him level
with his eye—and placed it back again untasted on the table. At last,
quietly, pale, he took from his coat pocket a heavy volume, which often
he had carried there.
There were certain worn places where the book fell open readily.
Familiar words stared up at him.
The solitary reader, trained to literal interpretations, pondered what
he read. He endeavored to restore the vision of the Garden, the first
home of Man. He undertook to conceive the Temptation, to picture the
Serpent himself; indeed, tried to think as John Calvin thought when he
wrote his words:
But, since it could not have been a trivial offense, but must have
been a detestable crime, that was so severely punished by God, we must
consider the nature of Adam’s sin, which kindled the dreadful flame of
divine wrath against the whole human race.
Augustine properly observes, that pride was the first of all evils.
But we may obtain a more complete definition from the nature of the
temptation as described by Moses. For as the Woman, by the subtlety of
the Serpent, was seduced to discredit the word of God, it is evident
that the fall commenced in disobedience. This is also confirmed by
Paul, who states that all men were ruined by the disobedience of one.
With propriety, therefore, Bernard teaches that the gate of salvation
is opened to us, when in the present day we receive the Gospel with
our ears, as death was once admitted at the same doors when they lay
open to Satan.
Augustine? Bernard? Who were they? Dust and forgotten for the most
part. But after them and before them men had lived, human beings,
hoping, aspiring, falling, sinning. David Joslin, mountaineer, turned
once more to the pages of the old dogmatist.
This is that hereditary corruption which the fathers called _original
sin_; meaning by sin, the depravation of a nature previously good and
pure; on which subject they had much contention. Yet this timidity
could not prevent Pelagius from arising, who profanely pretended
that the sin of Adam only ruined himself, and did not injure his
descendants. But the temerity of the Pelagians and Celestians will not
appear surprising to him who perceives from the writings of Augustine
what a want of modesty they discover in everything else.
Every descendant from the impure source is born infected with the
contagion of sin; and even before we behold the light of life, we are
in the sight of God defiled and polluted. For “who can bring a clean
thing out of an unclean?” The Book of Job tells us, “Not one.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account