Capitalists and financiers -- Fiction; Commercial crimes -- Fiction; London (England) -- Fiction; Mate selection -- Fiction; Satire
Now Sir Felix was the next heir. Roger was hampered by no entail,
and could leave every acre of the property as he pleased. In one
respect the natural succession to it by Sir Felix would generally be
considered fortunate. It had happened that a title had been won in a
lower branch of the family, and were this succession to take place
the family title and the family property would go together. No doubt
to Sir Felix himself such an arrangement would seem to be the most
proper thing in the world,--as it would also to Lady Carbury were it
not that she looked to Carbury Manor as the future home of another
child. But to all this the present owner of the property had very
strong objections. It was not only that he thought ill of the baronet
himself,--so ill as to feel thoroughly convinced that no good
could come from that quarter,--but he thought ill also of the
baronetcy itself. Sir Patrick, to his thinking, had been altogether
unjustifiable in accepting an enduring title, knowing that he would
leave behind him no property adequate for its support. A baronet, so
thought Roger Carbury, should be a rich man, rich enough to grace the
rank which he assumed to wear. A title, according to Roger's doctrine
on such subjects, could make no man a gentleman, but, if improperly
worn, might degrade a man who would otherwise be a gentleman. He
thought that a gentleman, born and bred, acknowledged as such without
doubt, could not be made more than a gentleman by all the titles
which the Queen could give. With these old-fashioned notions Roger
hated the title which had fallen upon a branch of his family. He
certainly would not leave his property to support the title which Sir
Felix unfortunately possessed. But Sir Felix was the natural heir,
and this man felt himself constrained, almost as by some divine law,
to see that his land went by natural descent. Though he was in no
degree fettered as to its disposition, he did not presume himself to
have more than a life interest in the estate. It was his duty to see
that it went from Carbury to Carbury as long as there was a Carbury
to hold it, and especially his duty to see that it should go from
his hands, at his death, unimpaired in extent or value. There was
no reason why he should himself die for the next twenty or thirty
years,--but were he to die Sir Felix would undoubtedly dissipate the
acres, and then there would be an end of Carbury. But in such case
he, Roger Carbury, would at any rate have done his duty. He knew that
no human arrangements can be fixed, let the care in making them be
ever so great. To his thinking it would be better that the estate
should be dissipated by a Carbury than held together by a stranger.
He would stick to the old name while there was one to bear it, and
to the old family while a member of it was left. So thinking he had
already made his will, leaving the entire property to the man whom of
all others he most despised, should he himself die without child.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account