“I know that as well as the best lawyer in Duke’s; but _character_ can
tell ag’in an accused, as is very likely to be shown in the Oyer and
Tarminer of this day. Character counts, let me tell you, when the facts
get a little confused; and this is just what I was about to say. Mary
Monson has money; where does it come from?”
“Those that think her guilty say that it comes from poor Mrs. Goodwin’s
stockin’,” returned Hicks, with a laugh; “but, for my part, I’ve _seen_
that stockin’, and am satisfied it didn’t hold five hundred dollars, if
it did four.”
Here the reporter out with his notes, scribbling away for some time.
That evening a paragraph, a little altered to give it point and
interest, appeared in an evening paper, in which the conflicting
statements of Tongue and Hicks were so presented, that neither of these
worthies could have recognised his own child. That paper was in Biberry
next morning, and had no inconsiderable influence, ultimately, on the
fortunes of the accused.
In the bar-room of Mrs. Horton, the discussion was also lively and wily
on this same subject. As this was a place much frequented by the jurors,
the agents of Timms and Williams were very numerous in and around that
house. The reader is not to suppose that these men admitted directly to
themselves even, the true character of the rascally business in which
they were engaged; for their employers were much too shrewd not to
cover, to a certain degree, the deformity of their own acts. One set had
been told that they were favouring justice, bringing down aristocratic
pride to the level of the rights of the mass, demonstrating that this
was a free country, by one of the very vilest procedures that ever
polluted the fountains of justice at their very source. On the other
hand, the agents of Timms had been persuaded that they were working in
behalf of a persecuted and injured woman, who was pressed upon by the
well-known avarice of the nephew of the Goodwins, and who was in danger
of becoming the victim of a chain of extraordinary occurrences that had
thrown her into the meshes of the law. It is true, this reasoning was
backed by liberal gifts; which, however, were made to assume the aspect
of compensation fairly earned; for the biggest villain going derives a
certain degree of satisfaction in persuading himself that he is acting
under the influence of motives to which he is, in truth, a stranger. The
homage which vice pays to virtue is on a much more extended scale than
is commonly supposed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account