“Gentlemen, we shall offer you this proof. We shall show you that the
skeletons of which I have spoken, and which lie under that pall, sad
remains of a most ruthless scene, are beyond all question the skeletons
of Peter and Dorothy Goodwin. This will be shown to you by proof; though
all who knew the parties, can almost see the likeness in these sad
relics of mortality. Peter Goodwin, as will be shown to you, was a very
short, but sturdy man, while Dorothy, his wife, was a woman of large
size. The skeletons meet this description exactly. They were found on
the charred wood of the bedstead the unhappy couple habitually used, and
on the very spot where they had passed so many previous nights in
security and peace. Everything goes to corroborate the identity of the
persons whose remains have been found, and I regret it should be my duty
to add, that everything goes to fasten the guilt of these murders on the
prisoner at the bar.
“Gentlemen, although we rely mainly on the possession of the Dutch or
Italian coin, no matter which, to establish the case for the state, we
shall offer you a great deal of sustaining and secondary proof. In the
first place, the fact that a female, young, handsome, well, nay,
expensively educated, coming from nobody knows whence, to go nobody
knows whither, should suddenly appear in a place as retired as the house
of Peter Goodwin, why no one can say, are in themselves very suspicious.
Gentlemen, ‘all is not gold that glitters.’ Many a man, and many a
woman, in places large as New York, are not what they seem to be. They
dress, and laugh, and sing, and appear to be among the gayest of the
gay, when they do not know where to lay their heads at night. Large
towns are moral blotches, they say, on the face of the community, and
they conceal many things that will not bear the light. From one of these
large towns, it is to be presumed from her dress, manners, education,
amusements, and all belonging to her, came Mary Monson, to ask an asylum
in the dwelling of the Goodwins. Gentlemen, why did she come? Had she
heard of the hoard of Mrs. Goodwin, and did she crave the possession of
the gold? These questions it will be your duty to answer in your
verdict. Should the reply be in the affirmative, you obtain, at once, a
direct clue to the motives for the murder.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account