“Your pardon, sir,” put in Dunscomb, with great self-command, but very
firmly—“words must not be put into the witness’s mouth, nor ideas into
her head. She has sworn, may it please your honour, to a certain
stocking; which stocking she described in her examination in chief; and
we now ask her if this is that stocking. All this is regular, I believe;
and I trust we are not to be interrupted.”
“Go on, sir,” said the judge; “the prosecution will not interrupt the
defence. But time is very precious.”
“Is this the stocking?” repeated Dunscomb.
The woman examined the stocking, looking inside and out, turning it over
and over, and casting many a curious glance at the places that had been
mended.
“It’s dreadful darney, isn’t it?” she said, looking inquiringly at the
counsellor.
“It is as you see, Ma’am. I have made no alteration in it.”
“I declare I believe this _is_ the very stocking.”
“At the proper time, your honour, we shall show that this is _not_ the
stocking, if indeed there ever was such a stocking at all,” said Timms,
rolling up the article in question, and handing it to the clerk to keep.
“You saw a certain piece of gold, you say,” resumed Dunscomb, “which
piece of gold I understand you to say was afterwards found in the pocket
of Mary Monson. Will you have the goodness to say whether the piece of
gold which you saw in Mrs. Goodwin’s possession is among these?”—showing
a dozen coins; “or whether one resembling it is here?”
The woman was greatly puzzled. She meant to be honest; had told no more
than was true, with the exception of the little embellishments that her
propensity to imagine and talk rendered almost unavoidable; but, for the
life of her, she could not distinguish the piece of money, or its
counterpart. After examining the coins for several minutes she frankly
admitted her ignorance.
“It is scarcely necessary to continue this cross-examination,” said
Dunscomb, looking at his watch. “I shall ask the court to adjourn, and
to adjourn over until morning. We have reached the hour for lighting
candles; but we have agents out in quest of most important witnesses;
and we ask the loss of this evening as a favour. It can make no great
difference as to the length of the trial; and the jurors will be all the
fresher for a good night’s rest.”
The court acquiesced, and allowed of the adjournment, giving the jury
the usual charge about conversing or making up their opinions until they
had heard the whole testimony; a charge that both Williams and Timms
took very good care to render of no use in several instances, or as
regarded particular individuals.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account