This witness was then questioned on the subject of the stocking, and
Mrs. Goodwin’s hoard of money. He had seen the stocking but once, had
often heard it mentioned by his sisters, did not think his wife had ever
alluded to it, did not know the amount of the gold, but supposed it
might be very considerable, saw the bureau examined, and knew that the
stocking could not be found. In a word, his testimony in chief went
generally to sustain the impression that prevailed relative to the
murders, though it is unnecessary to repeat it in this form, as the
cross-examination will better explain his statements and opinions.
“Mr. Burton,” said Dunscomb, “you knew the Goodwins well?”
“Very well, sir. As well as near neighbours generally know each other.”
“Can you swear that those are the skeletons of Peter and Dorothy
Goodwin?”
“I can swear that I _believe_ them to be such—have no doubt of the
fact.”
“Point out that which you suppose to be the skeleton of Peter Goodwin.”
This request embarrassed the witness. In common with all around him, he
had no other clue to his facts than the circumstances under which these
vestiges of mortality had been found, and he did not know what ought to
be his reply.
“I suppose the shortest of the skeletons to be Peter Goodwin’s, and the
longest that of his wife,” he at length answered. “Peter was not as tall
as Dorothy.”
“Which is the shortest of these remains?”
“That I could not say, without measuring. I know that Goodwin was not as
tall as his wife by half an inch, for I have seen them measure.”
“Then you would say that, in your opinion, the longest of these two
skeletons is that of Dorothy Goodwin, and the shortest that of her
husband?”
“Yes, sir; that is my opinion—formed to the best of my knowledge. I have
seen them measure.”
“Was this measurement accurate?”
“Very much so. They used to dispute about their height, and they
measured several times, when I was by; generally in their stocking feet,
and once barefoot.”
“The difference being half an inch in favour of the wife?”
“Yes, sir, as near as could be; for I was umpire more than once.”
“Did Peter Goodwin and his wife live happily together?”
“Tolerable—much as other married folks get along.”
“Explain what you mean by that.”
“Why, there’s ups and downs, I suppose, in all families. Dorothy was
high-tempered, and Peter was sometimes cross-grained.”
“Do you mean that they quarrelled?”
“They got r’iled with each other, now and then.”
“Was Peter Goodwin a sober man?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account