There is one vital point concerning the development of Venus upon which
we have as yet no positive knowledge: the length of time in which she
rotates on her axis. This is unfortunate, because until her time of
rotation is known we cannot know much about her physical condition.
Her rotation, we know, determines the length of her day and night, or
whether, indeed, she has any. The time of it has been calculated to be
anywhere from a little less than one of our days to two hundred and
twenty-five, the latter being also the time of her revolution about
the sun. Astronomers of equal reputation have come to exactly opposite
results in their investigations. To one, the spectroscope has indicated
the short day and night; to another it has shown no day and night,
but a planet with one face forever toward the sun, like Mercury. What
appeared to be stable surface markings have been observed, but have
indicated under the eyes of different observers both the short day and
no day at all. The disc has been measured during a transit, and shows
so little flattening as to indicate a slow rotation and the long day.
On the other hand, the best authorities think it unlikely that at the
distance of Venus the sun could so retard the planet’s rotation as to
make it coincide with its time of revolution. Thus the question is
still an open one.
The truth may be that, owing to the density of her atmosphere, the
surface of Venus has never been seen at all, and that the apparently
stable markings are but clouds more or less lacking in stability. The
difficulty of observing Venus will probably make it impossible to
determine this point by visual observation. It may some day be settled
beyond a doubt by the spectroscope. In some way it will surely be
settled. Astronomers have too often made possible what seemed to be
impossible for us to doubt that some one will find a way to discover
this secret of Venus. With them a failure to prove a conclusion does
not mean to abandon the subject, but to try some other means of getting
at the truth.
* * * * *
The sun viewed from Venus would appear considerably larger than it does
to us. Its apparent diameter to us is a little more than thirty-two
minutes, while on Venus it would be something more than thirty-eight
minutes; that is, it would appear about one-fifth larger on Venus than
it does to us. This is enough to make a material difference between
the two planets in the amount of heat and light they receive. Venus
receives nearly twice (1.9) as much heat and light from the sun as we
receive, but less than one-third as much as Mercury. If she had no
atmospheric protection, there is no question but that she would have a
climate disastrously warm for a race of beings constituted as we are.
The normal temperature of an unprotected body at the distance of Venus
is about 158° Fahrenheit (70° Centigrade).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account